The Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty With and Without Patellar Resurfacing up to 17 Years: A Report From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 20. J Exp Orthop. 2025 Oct 17;12(4):e70448. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70448. eCollection 2025 Oct. No difference in revision rate in patella-friendly total knee arthroplasty with or without patella resurfacing at 5 years' follow-up. A database analysis. Massardier E(1), Manchec O(2), Bérard E(3), Lustig S(4), Cavaignac E(2). Author information: (1)Department of Lower Limb Orthopaedic and Traumatology Surgery Edouard Herriot University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon Lyon France. (2)Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology Surgery Pierre-Paul Riquet University Hospital Toulouse Cedex 9 France. (3)Department of Epidemiology and Public Health Toulouse University Hospital, CERPOP, INSERM-University of Toulouse UPS Toulouse France. (4)Department of Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon North University Hospital Lyon France. PURPOSE: Numerous studies have been published on the optimal management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but controversy remains. The aim of this study was to compare survivorship and functional outcomes with or without patella resurfacing, using a single TKA implant. METHODS: This retrospective database analysis included 6078 TKA of the same cruciate-sacrificing, mobile-bearing, 'patella-friendly' model implanted between March 2002 and December 2018 for primary osteoarthritis. TKAs implanted for inflammatory arthritis or bone tumour were excluded. The implant's survivorship was estimated at 5 years' follow-up using the Kaplan-Meier method. Functional assessments consisted of the KSS score and knee flexion. RESULTS: The 1641 patients who had at least 5 years' follow-up were separated into two groups: patella resurfacing (PR) (n = 656) and no patella resurfacing (NPR) (n = 985). Mean age was 69.8 years [25-96] and mean follow-up time was 98.4 months [60-247]. There was no difference in survivorship without reoperation between the two groups (98.4% [95% confidence interval [CI] 97.8-99] vs. 98.4% [95% CI 97.6-99.1; p = 0.95), nor in the mean KSS score (181.7 [95% CI 158.35-205.0] vs. 179.9 [95% CI 156.5-203.2]; p = 0.51). Survival free of patella-related revisions was 99.3% [95% CI 98.9-99.7] in the NPR group versus 99.7% [99.3-100.0] in the PR group (p = 0.02). Mean knee flexion was significantly less in the NPR group than in the PR group (116.1° [95% CI 104.5-127.8] vs. 118.8° [95% CI 106.7-131.0]; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Systematic patella resurfacing when doing TKA using the SCORE™ implant does not reduce the overall revision rate and does not improve functional scores. When only the revisions for patella-related complications are considered, the revision rate is lower in the NPR group. Knee flexion is better in patients who underwent patellar resurfacing, but this difference did not reach the clinically relevant threshold. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study. © 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70448 PMCID: PMC12531454