Orthonotes
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories
v3.0 Fusion
v3.0 Fusion
PubMed Cohort / Comparative Study Evidence Moderate

[The acromioclavicular joint].

Der Unfallchirurg | 2005 | Klonz A, Loitz D

In-App Reader

Open Source

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Source
PubMed
Type
Cohort / Comparative Study
Evidence
Moderate

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 7. Clin Sports Med. 2023 Oct;42(4):539-556. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 Jul 3. Management of Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries: A Historic Account. Peebles LA(1), Akamefula RA(1), Kraeutler MJ(2), Mulcahey MK(3). Author information: (1)Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Avenue, #2070, New Orleans, LA, USA. (2)Department of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, 6445 Main Street, #2300, Houston, TX, USA. (3)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA. Electronic address: mary.mulcahey.md@gmail.com. There has been a rapid evolution in best practice management of acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries. AP, Zanca, scapular Y, and dynamic axillary radiographic views provide optimal visualization of the joint and may assess for the presence of horizontal AC instability. Severity of AC joint pathology is classified according to the 6-tier Rockwood scoring system. Over 160 surgical techniques have been described for AC joint repair and reconstruction in the last decade; as a result, determining the optimal treatment algorithm has become increasingly challenging secondary to the lack of consistently excellent clinical outcomes. Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2023.05.001

Linked Wiki Topics

This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.

Linked Cases

This article has not been linked to a case yet.

Linked Atlases

This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.