Orthonotes
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories
v3.0 Fusion
v3.0 Fusion
PubMed Narrative Review Evidence Moderate

Technique and considerations when using external fixation as a standard treatment of femoral fractures in children.

Injury | 2004 | Hedin H, Larsson S

In-App Reader

Open Source

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Source
PubMed
Type
Narrative Review
Evidence
Moderate

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 17. Injury. 2008 Apr;39(4):456-62. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.07.029. Epub 2008 Feb 21. Bryant traction in paediatric femoral shaft fractures, home traction versus hospitalisation. Scheerder FJ(1), Schnater JM, Sleeboom C, Aronson DC. Author information: (1)The Pediatric Surgical Center of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital AMC, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands. AIM: To evaluate Bryant traction at home in terms of feasibility, morbidity, effect on length of hospital stay, outcome and costs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 54 children treated for femoral shaft fracture (1991-2004). Results of 'home traction' (A, n=38) and 'hospital traction' (B, n=16) were compared. Data were collected regarding demographics, length of hospital stay, traction period, various aspects of the fractures, co-morbidity, morbidity, and follow-up. The parents' experience was evaluated by telephone questionnaire. RESULTS: Two early treatment failures occurred. One patient stopped home traction at 8 days due to skin problems and had a spica cast applied at another hospital, with subsequent development of a compartment syndrome. The other patient was placed in a hip spica after 2 weeks of hospital traction because of difficulty in getting satisfactory X-rays. At follow-up, one unacceptable shortening of 3 cm had occurred in the home traction group. There was only a significant difference in hospital stay (A 7.0 days versus B 22.5 days), total traction period (A 28.0 days versus B 22.5 days) and costs (group B 3x versus group A). The parents were overall pleased with traction at home. Complications occurred as much in the home traction group as in the control group and fracture position at union was equal in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with home traction is feasible, simple and effective; it reduces hospital stay to 1 week, and costs to one-third. Good patient selection and instructions of the parents are mandatory. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.07.029

Linked Wiki Topics

This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.

Linked Cases

This article has not been linked to a case yet.

Linked Atlases

This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.