British journal of hospital medicine (London, England : 2005) | 2019 | Kropelnicki A, Ali AM, Popat R, Sarraf KM
Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.
[Indexed for MEDLINE] 12. Instr Course Lect. 2024;73:421-425. Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: When Lateral Entry Pins Are Not Enough. Fabricant PD. Percutaneous pin configuration for the management of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures has been studied extensively both in the biomechanics laboratory and in the clinical setting. Medial entry pins (ie, crossed pinning) increase supracondylar humerus fracture construct stability under certain loading conditions. However, there are noted drawbacks of medial entry pinning, specifically the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. In most circumstances, the additional biomechanical stability of crossed pinning is unlikely to be clinically necessary for maintenance of fracture alignment, but there are scenarios in which medial entry pins should be strongly considered. It is important to review the biomechanics of various pin configurations in the setting of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures, discuss the indications for medial entry pinning (crossed pinning), and discuss a safe technique for applying medial entry pins when indicated.
This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.
This article has not been linked to a case yet.
This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.