Does Patellar Resurfacing Improve Outcomes in Valgus Osteoarthritis with Compromised Patellofemoral Joint Status? A Retrospective Consecutive Comparative Study.

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. 19. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jan;35(1):132-138. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.007. Epub 2019 Aug 12. The Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty With and Without Patellar Resurfacing up to 17 Years: A Report From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Coory JA(1), Tan KG(2), Whitehouse SL(2), Hatton A(3), Graves SE(4), Crawford RW(2). Author information: (1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia. (2)Orthopaedic Research Unit, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia. (3)South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia. (4)Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), Adelaide, Australia. BACKGROUND: Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a controversial issue after more than 4 decades of TKA. Despite a growing body of evidence from registry data, resurfacing is still based largely on a surgeon's preference and training. The purpose of this study is to provide long-term outcomes for patellar resurfaced compared to when the patella is not resurfaced. METHODS: Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (1999-2017) were used for this study. The analysis included 570,735 primary TKAs undertaken for osteoarthritis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 17-year cumulative percent revision rates were used to compare revision rates between 4 subgroups: minimally stabilized (MS) patellar resurfacing, posterior stabilized (PS) patellar resurfacing, MS unresurfaced, and PS unresurfaced patella. Additional analyses of the patellar implant type and a comparison of inlay and onlay patellar resurfacing were also performed. RESULTS: For all primary TKA, procedures where the patella was not resurfaced have a higher rate of revision compared to procedures where the patella was resurfaced (HR, 1.31; confidence interval, 1.28-1.35; P < .001). Unresurfaced PS knees have the highest cumulative percent revision at 17 years (11.1%), followed by MS unresurfaced (8.8%), PS resurfaced (7.9%), and MS resurfaced (7.1%). Inlay patellar resurfacing has a higher rate of revision compared to onlay patellar resurfacing (HR, 1.27; confidence interval, 1.17-1.37; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Resurfacing the patella reduces the rate of revision for both MS and PS knees. MS knees with patellar resurfacing have the lowest rate of revision. Onlay patella designs are associated with a lower revision rate compared to inlay patella designs. Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.007