Orthonotes
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories
v3.0 Fusion
v3.0 Fusion
PubMed Cohort / Comparative Study Evidence Moderate

[Distal radius fractures: new concepts as basis for surgical treatment].

Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse : Organ der V... | 2007 | Rikli DA, Babst R, Jupiter JB

In-App Reader

Open Source

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Source
PubMed
Type
Cohort / Comparative Study
Evidence
Moderate

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 7. J Pediatr Soc North Am. 2024 Feb 12;5(1):627. doi: 10.55275/JPOSNA-2023-627. eCollection 2023 Feb. A Review and Comparison of Hexapod External Fixators. Lobst C(1), Ferreira N(2), Kold S(3). Author information: (1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH. (2)Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa. (3)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. Hexapod external fixators, allowing for multiaxial deformity correction and fracture treatment, have been on the market for more than 25 years. The recent increase in the number of hexapod circular external fixators establishes the need for an easy-to-access overview of the different systems. An overview of the current options is provided, and a comparison is made of seven common hexapod circular external fixators. Highlights of each system's hardware, software, and educational opportunities are provided. The information collected from the manufacturers of each system was carefully and objectively edited to fit the structure of the review without including any additional subjective comments or recommendations. The authors believe that the development of multiple systems has had a positive effect on this technology. Only two clinical retrospective studies were found comparing the results of different systems, and there seems to be a clear opportunity for collaborative, multi-center comparative studies. The authors recommend choosing one hexapod system that feels comfortable and fits patient demands prior to pursuing mastering several systems. Level of Evidence: Review; Level 4 Key Concepts•Technical advances have driven the development of multiple high-quality hexapod external fixator systems.•Surgeons should aim to master one system that fits their patient population before pursuing other systems.•High-volume surgeons and clinics should invest in trials that directly compare different hexapod external fixators. © 2023 JPOSNA. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America. DOI: 10.55275/JPOSNA-2023-627 PMCID: PMC12088101

Linked Wiki Topics

This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.

Linked Cases

This article has not been linked to a case yet.

Linked Atlases

This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.