Orthonotes
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories
v3.0 Fusion
v3.0 Fusion
PubMed Cohort / Comparative Study Evidence Moderate

Proximal femoral nail antirotation internal fixation in treating intertrochanteric femoral fractures of elderly subjects.

Journal of biological regulators and homeostatic agents | 2017 | Jia L, Zhang K, Wang ZG, Wang L

In-App Reader

Open Source

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Source
PubMed
Type
Cohort / Comparative Study
Evidence
Moderate

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 13. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2022;33(1):187-192. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2022.498. Epub 2022 Mar 28. The intra- and interobserver reliability of five commonly used intertrochanteric femur fracture classification systems. Yıldırım C, Muratoğlu OG(1), Turan K, Ergün T, Mısır A, Aydın M. Author information: (1)İstinye Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, 34010 Zeytinburnu, İstanbul, Türkiye. osman.muratoglu@istinye.edu.tr. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the effect of surgical experience on reliability for Boyd-Griffin, Evans/Jensen, Evans, Orthopaedic Trauma Association (main and subgroups), and Tronzo classification systems. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2013 and December 2014, radiological images of a total of 60 patients (13 males, 47 females; mean age: 78.9±21.9 years; range, 61 to 96 years) with the diagnosis of intertrochanteric femur fracture were analyzed. Radiographs were evaluated and classified by five residents and five orthopedics and traumatology surgeons according to the Evans, Boyd-Griffin, Evans/Jensen, OTA, and Tronzo classification systems. Intra- and interobserver reliability were calculated using the kappa statistics. RESULTS: The worst intraobserver compatibility among the residents was the classification system with OTA subgroups (κ=0.516), while the classification system with the best intraobserver fit was found to be OTA main groups (κ=0.744). The worst agreement among surgeons was in the Evans classification system (κ=0.456). However, the best intraobserver agreement was in the OTA main groups (κ=0.741). The best interobserver agreement was observed regarding the OTA main groups (κ=0.699). CONCLUSION: The classification that has the best harmony both among residents and surgeons, and between residents and surgeons is the OTA main group classification. DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2022.498 PMCID: PMC9057552

Linked Wiki Topics

This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.

Linked Cases

This article has not been linked to a case yet.

Linked Atlases

This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.