Arthroplasty for weight-bearing shoulders.

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 10. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2007 Jan;221(1):87-96. doi: 10.1243/09544119JEIM167. Developments in shoulder arthroplasty. Gregory T(1), Hansen U, Emery RJ, Augereau B, Amis AA. Author information: (1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, European Hospital George Pompidou, Paris, France. Indications for shoulder arthroplasty are numerous, mainly owing to glenohumeral osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or fracture of the proximal humerus. However, the anatomy and the biomechanics of the shoulder are complex and shoulder arthroplasty has evolved significantly over the past 30 years. This paper presents the main recent evolutions in shoulder replacement, the questions not answered yet, and the main future areas of research. The review focuses firstly on the design, positioning, and fixation of the humeral component, secondly on the design, positioning, and fixation of the glenoid implant, and thirdly on other concepts of shoulder arthroplasty such as the reversed prosthesis, the cementless surface replacement arthroplasty, and the bipolar arthroplasty. This review demonstrates that more research is needed. Although, in the long term, large randomized trials are needed to settle the fundamental questions of what type of replacement and which kind of fixation should be used, biomechanical research in the laboratory should be focused primarily on the comprehension of glenoid loosening, which is a major cause of total shoulder arthroplasty failure, and the significance of radiolucent lines which are often seen but with no clear understanding about their relation with failure. DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM167