Surgical reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint: Can we identify the optimal approach?

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

Conflict of interest statement: CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. ETHICAL APPROVAL: This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. 19. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Sep;32(9):1972-1980. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.019. Epub 2023 Apr 17. Complications after operative treatment of high-grade acromioclavicular injuries. Chen RE(1), Gates ST(2), Vaughan A(2), Santoro A(2), Reddy Y(2), Williams GR(2), Namdari S(2). Author information: (1)Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: Raymond.edward.chen@gmail.com. (2)Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, USA. BACKGROUND: Treatment of Rockwood type III-V acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries remains controversial. Numerous reconstruction techniques have been proposed. The purpose of this study was to describe the complication profile in a large cohort of patients who underwent surgical management of AC joint separations using a variety of reconstruction strategies. METHODS: All patients who underwent surgery for AC joint injuries from 2013 to 2019 at a single institution were identified. Chart review was performed to capture patient demographics, radiographic measurements, operative techniques, postoperative complications, and revision surgery. Structural failure was defined as a radiographic loss of reduction of greater than 50% when comparing immediate and final postoperative imaging. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for complications and revision surgery. RESULTS: Of the 279 patients included in the study, 66 (24%) had type III separations, 20 (7%) type IV, and 193 (69%) type V. Fifty-three percent underwent surgery acutely (3 months). A total of 252 of the 279 surgeries (90%) were performed open and 27 (10%) were arthroscopically assisted. Allograft was used in 164 of 279 (59%) cases. Specific operative techniques (with or without allograft) included hook plating (1%), modified Weaver Dunn (16%), cortical button fixation (18%), and suture fixation (65%). At mean 28-week follow-up, 108 complications were identified in 97 patients (35%). Complications were identified at mean 20 ± 21 weeks. Sixty-nine structural failures (25%) were identified. Persistent AC joint pain requiring injection, clavicle fracture, adhesive capsulitis, and hardware complications were the other most common complications. Twenty-one patients (8%) underwent unplanned revision surgery at mean 38 ± 28 weeks after the index procedure, with the most common indication for structural failure, hardware complications, or fracture of the clavicle or coracoid. Patients who had surgery after 6 weeks from injury had a significantly greater risk of having a complication (odds ratio [OR] 3.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-7.77, P = .009) and a significantly greater risk of having structural failure (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.38-5.28, P = .004). Patients who had an arthroscopic technique had a greater risk of structural failure (P = .002). Complications, structural failure, and revision surgery were not significantly correlated with use of allograft or specific operative techniques. CONCLUSION: Surgical management of AC joint injuries is associated with a relatively high complication profile. Loss of reduction in the postoperative period is common. However, the revision surgery rate is low. These findings are important for patient preoperative counseling. Copyright © 2023 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.019