Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong) | 2026 | Jinwen Z, Xiang M, Li Y, Chen H
Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.
[Indexed for MEDLINE] Conflict of interest statement: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The corresponding author (XM) designed the SAHP and holds Chinese patent (ZL 202110295791.5). The device is not commercially available, and no author has received or will receive financial compensation related to it. All surgical procedures were performed by the first author (ZJW). To minimize bias, data collection, radiographic measurements, functional assessments, and statistical analyses were independently performed by co-authors (LYP, CH, YJS, ZQ) who have no financial interests in the device. No commercial funding or industry support was received for this study. 15. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(19):e19830. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019830. Functional outcomes after treatments for different types of isolated ulnar coronoid fracture: A protocol for systematic review. Chen H(1), Wu J(2), Zhao P(1), Wu L(3), Guo C(4). Author information: (1)Department of Orthopedics, Wenzhou Medical College-Affiliated Yiwu Central Hospital. (2)Department of orthopaedics, Mindong Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University. (3)Institute of Digital Medical Research, Wenzhou Medical College. (4)Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital of Henan Province Orthopedic Hospital, Henan Province, China. BACKGROUND: Optimal treatments for ulnar coronoid fracture have yet to be determined. We aimed to systematically review treatment efficacy assessed by functional outcomes of patients with isolated ulnar coronoid fracture. METHODS: Medline, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for studies reporting quantitative outcomes data after surgical treatment for isolated ulnar coronoid fractures up to July 16, 2019. Functional outcomes determined using disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score; Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS); and range of motion were systematically reviewed. RESULTS: Six studies with a total of 65 patients with isolated coronoid fracture who had received surgical treatment were included. All studies were of good quality according to a modified Delphi checklist. Most patients had Type II fractures based on Regan-Morrey or O'Driscoll classification. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand scores were reported by 2 studies (mean range 5-17). Four studies reported MEPS (mean range 89-98). One study reported Broberg-Morrey scores, in which 93% patients achieved excellent or good outcomes. Five studies reported range of motion, with mean flexion ranging from 122 to 137 and mean extension ranging from 4.0 to 21 degrees. Quantitative analyses revealed that lateral, medial, or posterior approaches in treating Type II fractures are associated with higher postoperative MEPS and flexion scores than the anteromedial approach. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment efficacy assessed by functional outcomes for isolated ulnar coronoid fractures is overall satisfactory. Whether lateral, medial, or posterior approaches lead to more favorable outcomes than the anteromedial approach is inconclusive. Further prospective studies are warranted. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019830 PMCID: PMC7220373
This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.
This article has not been linked to a case yet.
This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.