Acta orthopaedica Belgica | 1971 | Van der Beken A
Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.
[Indexed for MEDLINE] 6. Arthroscopy. 2016 Aug;32(8):1558. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.029. Editorial Commentary: Are Larger Screws the Answer When Anatomic Reconstruction of an Acromioclavicular Separation Fails? Denard PJ(1). Author information: (1)Medford, Oregon. Comment on Arthroscopy. 2016 Aug;32(8):1551-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.01.050. Although fixation methods have improved, failure after fixation of an acromioclavicular joint separation is not uncommon. This biomechanical study shows that in the setting of graft slippage through previously well-placed clavicular tunnels, a revision anatomic reconstruction is feasible with larger tenodesis screws. Although the risk of clavicular fracture increases with larger tunnels, anatomic revision with larger screws is an option in select cases. Copyright © 2016 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.029
This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.
This article has not been linked to a case yet.
This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.