Should we recommend patellofemoral arthroplasties to patients?

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

Conflict of interest statement: M. Vella-Baldacchino is an Orthopaedic Research UK Early Career Research Fellow (Project no: 551), and discloses grants or contracts from Orthopaedic Research UK. A. Davies declares being a Royal College of Surgeons of England Research Fellow. 7. Cureus. 2024 Oct 6;16(10):e70936. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70936. eCollection 2024 Oct. Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Contentious Matter. Upadhyay P(1), Salwan A(1), Kanani K(1), Koushik A(1), Mittal A(1), Goyal S(1). Author information: (1)Orthopaedics and Trauma, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND. Orthopaedic surgeons hold differing opinions on replacing the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for knee osteoarthritis, sparking a continued discussion on the optimal approach. Patellar resurfacing (PR) replaces the patella's surface with a prosthetic component, aiming to enhance joint function and reduce anterior knee pain. However, it has potential complications such as avascular necrosis, fractures, and patellar clunk syndrome. This analysis evaluates the effectiveness of TKA with and without PR, highlighting the variations in outcomes between the two methods. Findings suggest that resurfacing is associated with improved clinical outcomes, activity level, patient satisfaction, and pain relief. Nevertheless, the decision should be individualized based on patient preferences and circumstances. Additional long-term randomised controlled trials incorporating outcome measures specific to patellar function are required to better understand the effects of PR versus non-resurfacing in TKA. Copyright © 2024, Upadhyay et al. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.70936 PMCID: PMC11537212