Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery | 2002 | Muramatsu K, Doi K, Kuwata N, Kawakami F
Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.
[Indexed for MEDLINE] 18. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Dec 16;102(24):2138-2145. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00124. Improved Detection of Scaphoid Fractures with High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative CT Compared with Conventional CT. Daniels AM(1)(2), Bevers MSAM(3), Sassen S(1), Wyers CE(1)(2)(4), van Rietbergen B(3)(5), Geusens PPMM(4)(5), Kaarsemaker S(1), Hannemann PFW(4), Poeze M(2)(4), van den Bergh JP(1)(2)(4)(6), Janzing HMJ(1). Author information: (1)Departments of Surgery (A.M.D. and H.M.J.J.), Radiology (S.S.), Internal Medicine (C.E.W. and J.P.v.d.B.), and Orthopedic Surgery (S.K.), VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, the Netherlands. (2)NUTRIM School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands. (3)Orthopedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands. (4)Departments of Internal Medicine (C.E.W., P.P.M.M.G., and J.P.v.d.B.) and Surgery and Trauma Surgery (P.F.W.H. and M.P.), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands. (5)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Research School CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands. (6)Faculty of Medicine, Hasselt University, Belgium. BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, and bone scintigraphy are second-line imaging techniques that are frequently used for the evaluation of patients with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture. However, as a result of varying diagnostic performance results, no true reference standard exists for scaphoid fracture diagnosis. We hypothesized that the use of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) in patients with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture could improve scaphoid fracture detection compared with conventional CT in the clinical setting. METHODS: The present study included 91 consecutive patients (≥18 years of age) who presented to the emergency department with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture between December 2017 and October 2018. All patients were clinically reassessed within 14 days after first presentation, followed by CT and HR-pQCT. If a scaphoid fracture was present, the fracture type was determined according to the Herbert classification system and correlation between CT and HR-pQCT was estimated with use of the Kendall W statistic or coefficient of concordance (W) (the closer to 1, the higher the correlation). RESULTS: The cohort included 45 men and 46 women with a median age of 52 years (interquartile range, 29 to 67 years). HR-pQCT revealed a scaphoid fracture in 24 patients (26%), whereas CT revealed a scaphoid fracture in 15 patients (16%). Patients with a scaphoid fracture were younger and more often male. The correlation between CT and HR-pQCT was high for scaphoid fracture type according to the Herbert classification system (W = 0.793; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57 to 0.91; p < 0.001) and very high for scaphoid fracture location (W = 0.955; 95%, CI 0.90 to 0.98; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, the number of patients diagnosed with a scaphoid fracture was 60% higher when using HR-pQCT as compared with CT. These findings imply that a substantial proportion of fractures-in this study, more than one-third-will be missed by the current application of CT scanning in patients with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Copyright © 2020 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00124
This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.
This article has not been linked to a case yet.
This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.