Orthonotes
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories
v3.0 Fusion
v3.0 Fusion
PubMed Narrative Review Evidence Moderate

Anatomic Double-bundle ACL Reconstruction.

Sports medicine and arthroscopy review | 2010 | Schreiber VM, van Eck CF, Fu FH

In-App Reader

Open Source

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Source
PubMed
Type
Narrative Review
Evidence
Moderate

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 7. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2010 Mar;18(1):20-6. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181bf67ae. All-inside ACL: retroconstruction controversies. Lubowitz JH(1). Author information: (1)Taos Orthopaedic Institute Research Foundation, 1219-A Gusdorf Rd., Taos, NM 87571, USA. jlubowitz@kitcarson.net All-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is controversial because the technique is new; as a result, evidence-based clinical outcome studies have yet to be published. The purpose of this article is to consider the following controversies (considered alphabetically): anatomy, biomechanics, biology, bioabsorbables, divergence of the femoral interference screw, expansion or widening of tunnels, fixation, future considerations, graft choice, the learning curve, technique, tensioning, and tibia blow-out fracture. The technique should be learned in stages. In the opinion of the author, the history of sports medicine and arthroscopy has been a progression toward less invasive techniques. In the future, all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques should become more simple and reproducible, and clinical outcomes must be analyzed with long-term follow-up. DOI: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181bf67ae

Linked Wiki Topics

This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.

Linked Cases

This article has not been linked to a case yet.

Linked Atlases

This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.