Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery | 2024 | Böhringer A, Gebhard F, Dehner C, Eickhoff A
Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.
[Indexed for MEDLINE] Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. No company had influence in the collection of data or contributed to or had influence on the conception, design, analysis, and writing of the study. No further funding was received. 6. Orthopade. 2000 Oct;29(10):895-908. [The acromioclavicular joint]. [Article in German] Jerosch J(1). Author information: (1)Klinik für Orthopädie und Orthopädischer Chirurgie, Johanna-Etienne-Krankenhaus, Am Hasenberg 46, 41462 Neuss. jerosch@uni-muenster.de The anatomy and biomechanics of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint have been understood for a long time; however, the importance of this joint in the clinical setting is often underestimated. During clinical examination various sensitive functional tests can document any AC pathology. For X-ray documentation special techniques are necessary. Other imaging techniques are rarely indicated. The Rockwood classification for AC joint separation has increased our understanding of the pathology, which, in turn, leads to a better understanding of conservative and surgical therapy. Within the last few decades surgical treatment has shifted from AC to coracoclavicular stabilization. In patients with clinically relevant degenerative joint disease, resection of the lateral clavicle has proved to be a reproducible procedure. This operation can be performed using the conventional, open technique or with a minimally invasive procedure (arthroscopic resection of the AC joint; ARAC). In unstable joints, resection should be combined with a stabilization procedure.
This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.
This article has not been linked to a case yet.
This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.