Orthonotes
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories
v3.0 Fusion
v3.0 Fusion
Crossref Scholarly Work Evidence Unclassified

Randomized Trial of Reamed and Unreamed Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures

50 Studies Every Orthopaedic Surgeon Should Know | 2024 | Iris H. Y. Kwok, Peter Bates

In-App Reader

Open Source

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Source
Crossref
Type
Scholarly Work
Evidence
Unclassified

Abstract

Abstract A multicenter randomized controlled trial of 1226 patients with tibial shaft fractures was conducted across 29 centers in Canada, comparing reoperation and complication rates between reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing. It showed that reoperation rates were lower in the reamed group for closed fractures. In open fractures, there was no significant difference between reamed and unreamed groups. The overall reoperation rate in this study was 4.6%. There were significantly more deaths in the reamed compared to the unreamed group; however, the deaths were unrelated to the intramedullary nailing procedure itself.

Linked Wiki Topics

This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.

Linked Cases

This article has not been linked to a case yet.

Linked Atlases

This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.