Impact of Patient-Specific Hip Joint Geometry on the Morphology of Acetabular Fractures.

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. 8. World J Orthop. 2021 Feb 18;12(2):82-93. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i2.82. eCollection 2021 Feb 18. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification system using 3-dimensional printed solid models. Keltz E(1), Keshet D(1), Peled E(1), Zvi Y(2), Norman D(1), Keren Y(1). Author information: (1)Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa 3525408, Israel. (2)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY 10461, United States. BACKGROUND: Acetabular fractures pose diagnostic and surgical challenges. They are classified using the Judet-Letournel system, which is based solely on X-ray. However, computed tomography (CT) imaging is now more widely utilized in diagnosing these injuries. The emergence of 3-dimensional (3-D) printing technology in varying orthopedic fields has provided surgeons a solid model that improves their spatial understanding of complex fractures and ability to plan pre-operatively. AIM: To evaluate the reliability of the Judet-Letournel classification system of acetabular fractures, when using either CT imaging or 3-D printed models. METHODS: Seven patients with acetabular fractures underwent pelvic CT imaging, which was then used to create solid, 3-D printed models. Eighteen orthopaedic trauma surgeons responded to questionnaires regarding fracture classification and preferred surgical approach. The same questionnaire was completed using only CT imaging, and two weeks later, using only 3-D printed models. The inter- and intra-observer agreement rates were then analyzed. RESULTS: Inter-observer agreement rates based on CT imaging or 3-D printed models were moderate for fracture classification: κ = 0.44, κ = 0.55, respectively (P < 0.001) and fair for preferred surgical approach: κ = 0.34, κ = 0.29, respectively (P < 0.005). Intra-observer agreement rates for fracture classification and preferred surgical approach comparing CT imaging or 3-D printed models were moderate: κ = 0.48, κ = 0.41, respectively. No significant difference in intra-observer agreement was detected when comparing orthopedic pelvic specialists to general orthopedic traumatologists. CONCLUSION: The Judet-Letournel classification demonstrated only moderate rates of agreement. The use of 3-D printed models increased the inter-observer agreement rates with respect to fracture classification, but decreased it with respect to the preferred surgical approach. This study highlights the role of 3-D printed models in acetabular fractures by improving spatial understanding of these complex injuries, thus providing more reliable fracture diagnoses and alternative viewpoints for pre-operative planning. ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i2.82 PMCID: PMC7866486