Orthonotes
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories
v3.0 Fusion
v3.0 Fusion
PubMed Narrative Review Evidence Moderate

The Ilizarov Technique: A Dynamic Solution for Orthopaedic Challenges.

Orthopaedic surgery | 2024 | Guan S, Du H, Wu Y, Qin S

In-App Reader

Open Source

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Source
PubMed
Type
Narrative Review
Evidence
Moderate

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that they have no competing interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article. 4. J Child Orthop. 2016 Dec;10(6):585-592. doi: 10.1007/s11832-016-0789-6. Epub 2016 Nov 8. Humeral lengthening and deformity correction. Hosny GA(1). Author information: (1)Orthopaedic Department, Benha University Hospitals, 11 Al Israa Al-mohandeseen Street, Cairo, Egypt. gamalahosny@yahoo.com. INTRODUCTION: Ilizarov principles and hybrid fixation have improved the results of humeral lengthening. We reviewed the literature on humeral lengthening using different fixators with regard to indications, operative technique, results and complications. We also retrospectively reviewed 56 segments in 46 patients treated with humeral lengthening and deformity correction using Ilizarov external fixation. The etiology was achondroplasia (10 patients), epiphyseal injury (8 cases), infection (11 cases) and Erb's palsy (17 cases). The average age at surgery was 14 years (range 8-20 years). The patients were assessed clinically and radiographically and DASH score was available for 36 segments. Follow-up ranged from 1-11 years. The magnitude of lengthening achieved ranged from 5-15.5 cm with an average of 9 cm. The average healing index was 29.5 cm (range 26-37 days). The percentage of area of lengthening to the original length ranged from 25 to 100% with an average of 55%. The average DASH (available for 36 segments only) score ranged from 15-40 preoperatively to 7-16 (P = 0.04) at last follow-up. Functionally, all the patients returned to their preoperative jobs and daily activities including sports. COMPLICATIONS: Complications included pin track infection in 46 segments, radial nerve palsy which recovered completely in 2 patients, fracture of the regenerate in 7 cases and premature consolidation of the regenerate in one case. CONCLUSION: Humeral lengthening, whether unilateral or bilateral, is a valid method that improves the outcome following arm shortening and deformity correction, including angulation and rotation. Extensive lengthening up to 100% of the original length could be achieved without increasing the risk of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective cohort. DOI: 10.1007/s11832-016-0789-6 PMCID: PMC5145839

Linked Wiki Topics

This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.

Linked Cases

This article has not been linked to a case yet.

Linked Atlases

This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.