Inflammopharmacology | 2013 | Howie DW, Neale SD, Haynes DR, Holubowycz OT
Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.
[Indexed for MEDLINE] 16. Eur Spine J. 2025 Aug;34(8):3365-3375. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08926-6. Epub 2025 May 28. Patient outcomes and surgical strategies in revision cervical arthroplasty following M6-C™ disc-related osteolysis. Scott-Young M(1)(2), Nielsen D(3), Riar S(4)(3), Rathbone E(4). Author information: (1)Faculty of Health Science and Medicine, Bond University, 27 Garden Street, Southport, Gold Coast, QLD, 4215, Australia. mscott-young@goldcoastspine.com.au. (2)Gold Coast Spine, Gold Coast, QLD, 4215, Australia. mscott-young@goldcoastspine.com.au. (3)Gold Coast Spine, Gold Coast, QLD, 4215, Australia. (4)Faculty of Health Science and Medicine, Bond University, 27 Garden Street, Southport, Gold Coast, QLD, 4215, Australia. PURPOSE: Periprosthetic osteolysis from the M6-C™ Artificial Cervical Disc (Orthofix, Lewisville, Texas) has become a significant issue, sometimes requiring revision spine surgery (RSS). This study evaluates patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and revision strategies for managing device-related wear and osteolysis. METHODS: PROMs, including the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for neck/arm pain and the Neck Disability Index (NDI), were analyzed at pre-index surgery (T1), pre-RSS (T2), and final follow-up (T3). Osteolysis severity was graded radiographically. A control group who underwent primary M6-C cervical total disc replacement (CTDR) without RSS was included for comparison. RESULTS: Of 53 patients with M6-C CTDR, 19 (35.9%) required RSS due to osteolysis. Osteolysis grades included Grade 1 (4 patients), Grade 2 (7 patients), Grade 3 (3 patients), and Grade 4 (5 patients). Revision strategies included removal and anterior fusion, requiring vertebrectomy for Grade 4 cases; revisions to a different CTDR prosthesis were reserved for Grades 1-3. The RSS group showed significant VAS neck pain improvement at T3 (mean = 36.2 points, p
This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.
This article has not been linked to a case yet.
This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.