Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review.

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 15. Bone Joint J. 2025 Dec 1;107-B(12):1281-1287. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.107B12.BJJ-2025-0184.R2. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revisions to total knee arthroplasty : good outcomes at mid-term follow-up. Pumford AD(1), Salmons HI(1), Ledford CK(2), Bedard NA(1), Sierra RJ(1), Abdel MP(1), Hannon CP(1). Author information: (1)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. (2)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA. AIMS: Data on revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are limited by low patient numbers and short-term follow-up. This study evaluated the mid-term outcomes of revision of UKA to TKA focusing on implant survival, radiological results, and clinical outcomes in a large series. METHODS: We identified 235 revisions of UKA to TKA performed between 1995 and 2022 utilizing our institutional total joint registry. The mean age was 65 years (SD 10), mean BMI was 32 kg/m2 (SD 6), and 50% were female (n = 118). The most common indications for revision were aseptic loosening (37%; n = 83), progression of arthritis in adjacent compartments (35%; n = 81), and unexplained pain (20%; n = 47). The mean time from UKA to revision to a TKA was four years (26 days to 15 years). Posterior-stabilized constructs were used in 78% of the revisions (n = 184), varus-valgus constrained implants in 14% (n = 33), and cruciate-retaining implants in 7% (n = 16). Metaphyseal fixation devices were used in 8% of cases (n = 18) and augments in 31% (n = 73). Kaplan-Meier implant survival analyses were performed, radiographs reviewed, and clinical outcomes were measured with Knee Society Scores (KSSs). Mean follow-up was eight years (2 to 25). RESULTS: The five-year survival free of any re-revision was 93% (95% CI 89 to 97). There were 17 further re-revisions with femoral and/or tibial aseptic loosening (n = 7), periprosthetic joint infection (n = 4), and stiffness (n = 2) being the most common indications. The five-year survival free of any reoperation was 87% (95% CI 83 to 92). Stiffness (n = 7) and unresurfaced patellar clunk/crepitus (n = 4) were the most common indications for reoperations without implant exchange. There were 25 nonoperative postoperative complications, most commonly stiffness (n = 5), flexion instability (n = 4), and haematoma (n = 4). No unrevised TKAs showed signs of radiological loosening. KSS function score improved from 54 (SD 18) to 69 (SD 26; p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: In this large series of 235 revisions of UKA to TKA, the five-year survival of the TKAs free of re-revision was good. Our data suggest that the implant survival and clinical outcomes were inferior to primary TKA. Tibial component aseptic loosening was the most common reason for re-revision. © 2025 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.107B12.BJJ-2025-0184.R2