Olecranon fractures: A biomechanical comparison of three tension band wiring fixation methods on bone models

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to compare the biomechanical pull-out strength of the three different tension band wiring (TBW) methods employed to fix transverse olecranon fractures on bone models. Methods Three different fixation models were created in groups of seven synthetic olecranon fractured bone models. The first technique was fixed the olecranon with the traditional TBW method. The second technique was fixed the olecranon with a large intramedullary screw TBW method. The third technique was fixed the olecranon with the double-screw TBW method. The pull-out force needed for the failure of each specimen under the tensile test device was evaluated, and the results were recorded. Results We found that the lowest average pull out strength was 55.10 N (range: 35.87–65.85 ± 10.17) in the traditional TBW method, the highest pull out strength was 84.28 N (range: 63.67–117 ± 18.87) in the double-screw TBW method. The pull out strength was 70.80 N (range: 52.60–80.95 ± 10.18) in the intramedullary screw TBW method. In terms of ultimate failure loads, there was no significant difference between the intramedullary screw TBW and the double-screw TBW ( p > .05) while there was a significant difference between the traditional TBW and the other two methods ( p < .05). Conclusion The use of screw(s) shows higher biomechanical stability than K-wires in the TBW method. Double-screws fixation gives similar results in terms of the biomechanical load to failure compared to a large intramedullary screw fixation. Both screw methods can be used as stable constructs in clinical practice. Level of Evidence III, biomechanical trial.