International orthopaedics | 2018 | Rupp M, Biehl C, Budak M, Thormann U
Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.
[Indexed for MEDLINE] 2. Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2024 May;127(5):356-363. doi: 10.1007/s00113-023-01402-0. Epub 2024 Jan 15. [Nonunions after intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral fractures]. [Article in German; Abstract available in German from the publisher] Reumann MK(1), Hillrichs H(2), Menger MM(1), Herath SC(1), Rollmann MFR(1), Stuby F(2), Histing T(1), Braun BJ(3). Author information: (1)Klinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, BG Klinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland. (2)Klinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Allgemeinchirurgie, BG Unfallklinik Murnau, Murnau, Deutschland. (3)Klinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, BG Klinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland. bbraun@bgu-tuebingen.de. INTRODUCTION: The overall frequency of proximal femoral fractures means that we are repeatedly confronted with failed healing and implant failure, despite a relatively low nonunion rate especially in intertrochanteric fractures (
This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.
This article has not been linked to a case yet.
This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.