Selective Patellar Resurfacing: A Literature Review.

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 5. J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7 Suppl 2):S227-S232. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.02.060. Epub 2023 Feb 27. Outcomes and Survivorships of Total Knee Arthroplasty Comparing Resurfaced and Unresurfaced Patellae. Eiel ES(1), Donnelly P(2), Chen AF(3), Sloan M(4). Author information: (1)Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (2)American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, Illinois. (3)Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. (4)Orthopedic Affiliates, Concord, Massachusetts. BACKGROUND: The decision to resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. While there is some consensus that leaving the patella unresurfaced increases risk of reoperation, there is conflicting evidence about patient reported outcomes or indications for resurfacing. This study sought to determine recent rates of patellar resurfacing, examine factors affecting rates of resurfacing, and analyze the associations between patellar resurfacing and both revision rates and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: The American Joint Replacement Registry was used to identify primary TKAs performed for osteoarthritis between 2012 and 2021. Cases were classified as resurfaced patella and unresurfaced patella (URP). Outcomes analyzed included trends in patellar resurfacing, factors influencing rate of resurfacing, revision rates, operative time, and 2 PROMs. RESULTS: Rates of patellar resurfacing decreased and rates of URP increased significantly faster in ambulatory surgery centers and among high volume surgeons. Operative time was significantly lower in URP versus resurfaced patella (88.15 versus 89.90 minutes). The URP were significantly more likely to require revision surgery (odds ratio = 1.206 (1.078, 1.35), P = .0011). There was no significant difference in the likelihood of achieving the minimal clinically important difference in PROMs between resurfaced and nonresurfaced TKAs at 1 year (odds ratio = 1.060 (0.710, 1.581), P = .7755). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in minimal clinically important difference between resurfaced and URPs and no clinically relevant difference in operative time. However, URPs were more likely to require revision surgery. Therefore, the decision not to resurface should be made carefully considering the known risk of revision and the uncertain benefit. Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.02.060