Advances and innovations in total hip arthroplasty.

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

11. Indian J Orthop. 2020 Oct 6;55(Suppl 1):14-26. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00263-8. eCollection 2021 May. Application of 3D Printing in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review. Kumar P(1), Vatsya P(2), Rajnish RK(1), Hooda A(1), Dhillon MS(1). Author information: (1)Department of Orthopaedics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India. (2)Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, India. INTRODUCTION: Ideal surgical positioning and placement of implants during arthroplasty are crucial for long-term survival and optimal functional outcomes. Inadequate bone stock or defects, and anatomical variations can influence the outcomes. Three-dimensional printing (3DP) is an evolving technology that could provide patient-specific instrumentation and implants for arthroplasty, taking into account anatomical variations and defects. However, its application in this field is still not adequately studied and described. The present review was conceptualised to assess the practicality, the pros and cons and the current status of usage of 3DP in the field of hip and knee arthroplasties and joint reconstruction surgeries. METHODS: A PubMed database search was conducted and a total number of 135 hits were obtained, out of which only 30 articles were relevant. These 30 studies were assessed to obtain the qualitative evidence of the applicability and the current status of 3D printing in arthroplasty. RESULTS: Currently, 3DP is used for preoperative planning with 3D models, to assess bone defects and anatomy, to determine the appropriate cuts and to develop patient-specific instrumentation and implants (cages, liners, tibial base plates, femoral stem). Its models can be used for teaching and training young surgeons, as well as patient education regarding the surgical complexities. The outcomes of using customised instrumentations and implants have been promising and 3D printing can evolve into routine practice in the years to come. CONCLUSION: 3D printing in arthroplasty is an evolving field with promising results; however, current evidence is insufficient to determine significant advantages that can be termed cost effective and readily available. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00263-8 PMCID: PMC8149509