Design and optimisation of patient-specific porous femoral stems.

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] Conflict of interest statement: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Femur CT scan usage approved by the University of Melbourne Human Ethics Advisory Group (22159). Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. 20. EFORT Open Rev. 2020 Mar 2;5(3):126-137. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190011. eCollection 2020 Mar. Preoperative glenoid considerations for shoulder arthroplasty: a review. Gates S(1), Sager B(1), Khazzam M(1). Author information: (1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shoulder Service, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA. Preoperative assessment of the glenoid in the setting of shoulder arthroplasty is critical to account for variations in glenoid morphology, wear, version, inclination, and glenohumeral subluxation.Three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) scan assessment of the morphology of glenoid erosion allows for a more accurate surgical decision-making process to correct deformity and restore the joint line.Newer technology has brought forth computer-assisted software for glenoid planning in shoulder arthroplasty and patient-specific instrumentation.There have been promising early findings, although further evaluation is needed to determine how this technology impacts implant survivorship, function, and patient-reported outcomes. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:126-137. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190011. © 2020 The author(s). DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190011 PMCID: PMC7144890