Pathologic fracture in childhood and adolescent osteosarcoma: A single-institution experience.

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] Conflict of interest statement: Conflicts of interest: We report no conflicts of interest for this study. 18. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2010 Oct-Dec;23(4):1005-13. doi: 10.1177/039463201002300405. Infection following bone tumor resection and reconstruction with tumoral prostheses: a literature review. Graci C, Maccauro G, Muratori F, Spinelli MS, Rosa MA, Fabbriciani C. Bone resection is the choice treatment of malignant bone tumors. Tumor prosthesis is one of the most common solutions of reconstruction following resection of bone tumor located to the metaphysis of long bones. Periprosthetic infections are a frequent complication of limb-salvage surgery which is largely due to prolonged and repeated surgeries, as well as to the immunocompromised condition of these patients due to neoplastic treatment. Furthermore, the large exposure of tissues during this type of surgery and the dissection across vascular distributions also contributes to the high risk of infection. The authors reviewed the literature discussing the incidence of infections of tumor prosthesis implanted following resection of bone tumors, taking into account the different sites of implantation. In the English literature, the highest risk of infection which led to limb amputation was observed after proximal tibia resection and this difference was considered to be due to the poor condition of soft tissue and also after pelvic resection due to huge dead space after sarcoma resection not filled by implant. Independent of the location, the management of infected prosthesis is similar. That is, after one or more attempts at debridement and antibiotic therapy, it consists of implant removal and insertion of a new implant in a one- or two-stage procedure, with a decreased risk of failure with the two-stage procedure. DOI: 10.1177/039463201002300405