Orthonotes
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories
v3.0 Fusion
v3.0 Fusion
PubMed Systematic Review / Meta-analysis Evidence High

How reliable is the distinction between thoracolumbar AO type A3 and A4 fractures? A systematic literature review.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society | 2024 | Alabdallat YJ, Schroeder GD, Siddiqui S, Åkerstedt J

In-App Reader

Open Source

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Source
PubMed
Type
Systematic Review / Meta-analysis
Evidence
High

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 19. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 Dec;98(8):900-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Nov 17. Percutaneous fixation of thoracolumbar fractures: current concepts. Court C(1), Vincent C. Author information: (1)Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery Department, Bicetre University hospital, Paris, France. charles.court@bct.aphp.fr Numerous improvements in minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) have been made during the last decade. MISS in thoracolumbar spine trauma management must achieve the same results as conventional treatment but with less morbidity. The increased use of MISS technologies in spine trauma has been correlated to the availability of more versatile instrumentation, which makes the fixation of all thoracic and lumbar levels possible. Balloon-assisted techniques have been used to support the anterior column in a stand-alone manner or in combination with open or percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. Fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion is associated with less pedicle wall violation when compared to open surgery, but with increased radiation exposure for the surgeon and patient. Surgeons must be aware of this issue and new technologies are available to decrease irradiation. The advantages of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation relative to open surgery are discussed: preservation of posterior musculature, less blood loss, shorter operative time, lower infection risk, less postoperative pain, shorter rehabilitation time as well as shorter hospital stay. Limitations of percutaneous fixation include the inability to achieve direct spinal canal decompression and not having the option to perform a fusion. Nevertheless, these limitations can be addressed by combining MISS with open techniques. Indications for percutaneous spine fixation alone or in combination with MISS or open techniques are discussed based on the AO classification. The benefits of percutaneous spinal fixation for unstable spine fractures in polytrauma patients are also discussed. Posterior instrumentation can be easily removed after bone union to allow young patients to regain their mobility. Large well-controlled prospective studies are needed to draw up guidelines for less invasive procedures in spine trauma. In the future, development of new technologies can expand the scope of indications and treatment possibilities using MISS techniques in spine trauma. Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.09.014

Linked Wiki Topics

This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.

Linked Cases

This article has not been linked to a case yet.

Linked Atlases

This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.