Orthonotes
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories
v3.0 Fusion
v3.0 Fusion
PubMed Original Article Evidence Unclassified

One-bone forearm.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume | 1974 | Castle ME

In-App Reader

Open Source

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Source
PubMed
Type
Original Article
Evidence
Unclassified

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 6. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2024 Jan 1;33(1):58-64. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000001057. Epub 2023 Feb 8. Characteristics of forearm refracture in adolescents. Kapadia AB(1), Wilson PL(1)(2)(3), Gill CS(1)(2)(3), Wyatt CW(1)(2), Montgomery GK(2), Huang SG(1), Ellis HB Jr(1)(2)(3). Author information: (1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. (2)Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Scottish Rite for Children. (3)Division of Sports Medicine, Children's Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate characteristics of reinjury following forearm fractures in adolescents. An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective cohort study of forearm fractures (ages 10-18 years) treated by a single academic pediatric orthopaedic group from June 2009 to May 2020 was conducted. All both bone forearm (BBFA) and radius or ulna primary and secondary injuries were included. We excluded open, surgically treated, physeal, epiphyseal, and radial head/neck fractures. Demographics, injury characteristics, and radiographic data were recorded. We evaluated associations of ipsilateral same-site refracture (RE-FRACTURE) versus ipsilateral or contralateral different-site forearm fractures occurring as secondary later injuries (OTHER). Thirty-three of 719 patients sustained a secondary forearm fracture (4.6%; mean age, 11.5 years; M:F, 5.6:1). RE-FRACTURES, compared with OTHER forearm locations, were associated with a sports mechanism at time of original injury ( P = 0.024) and mid-shaft position of fracture on the radius (77.6 vs. 29.8 mm from distal physis; P < 0.001) and ulna (72.0 vs. 27.2 mm from distal physis; P = 0.003). RE-FRACTURES also demonstrated increased radius to ulna distance between BBFA primary injury sites on anteroposterior (19.6 vs. 10.6 mm; P = 0.009) and lateral radiographs (19.6 vs. 10.5 mm; P = 0.020) compared with OTHER forearm locations. Residual angulation and fracture-line visibility were not significantly associated with secondary fracture. Ipsilateral same-site refractures tend to occur in adolescents within 1 year following treatment for widely spaced (>15 mm) and mid-shaft forearm fractures incurred during athletic activity. Further research may be warranted to evaluate biologic, bone health, or personality traits that may lead to secondary fractures of the pediatric forearm. Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. DOI: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000001057 PMCID: PMC10686275

Linked Wiki Topics

This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.

Linked Cases

This article has not been linked to a case yet.

Linked Atlases

This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.