Shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture treatment: a retrospective functional outcome analysis.

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 15. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 May;33(5):1150-1156. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.09.035. Epub 2023 Nov 7. Acromion fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty occur in predictable clusters. Glener J(1), Vegas A(2), Schodlbauer DF(3), Levy JC(4). Author information: (1)Holy Cross Orthopedic Institute, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA. (2)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Larkin Community Hospital, South Miami, FL, USA. (3)Levy Shoulder Center at Paley Orthopedic & Spine Institute, Boca Raton, FL, USA. (4)Levy Shoulder Center at Paley Orthopedic & Spine Institute, Boca Raton, FL, USA. Electronic address: Jonlevy123@yahoo.com. BACKGROUND: Acromion and scapular spine fractures (ASFs) following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have been reported at a rate of 3.9%. The location of the fracture has been shown to be an important factor in determining the outcomes of nonoperative treatment, with medial fractures having worse outcomes than lateral fractures. As the debate between operative and nonoperative treatment continues, a more precise understanding of the location of the fracture is necessary for effective management. The purpose of this study was to use 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) reconstruction to characterize the exact location of ASFs after RSA. METHODS: A retrospective review of 2 separate institutional shoulder and elbow repositories was performed. Patients with post-RSA ASFs documented by post-fracture CT scans were included. The query identified 48 patients who sustained postoperative ASFs after RSA between July 2008 and September 2021. CT scans of patients with ASFs were segmented using Mimics software. Eight patients were excluded because of poor image quality. Each bone model was manipulated using 3-Matic Medical software to align the individual scapula with an idealized bone model to create a view of scapular fracture locations on a normalized bone model. This model was used to classify the fractures using the modified Levy classification. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 40 patients with a diagnosis of postoperative ASF after RSA. The median age at the time of surgery was 76 years (interquartile range, 73-79 years). The cohort comprised 32 women (80%) and 8 men (20%), with a median body mass index of 27.8. Only 10 patients (25%) had a previous diagnosis of osteoporosis and 6 (13%) had a diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis; 53% of patients underwent RSA owing to rotator cuff tear arthropathy. The distribution of fracture locations was similar within the cohort. However, lateral fractures were slightly more prevalent. The most common fracture location was the type I zone, with 12 fracture lines (29%). There were 11 fracture lines (26%) in the type IIa zone, 10 (23%) in the type IIb zone, 0 in the type IIc zone, and 9 (21%) in the type III zone. CONCLUSION: ASFs after RSA occur in 4 predictable clusters. No fractures appeared to distinctly cluster in the type IIc zone, which may not represent a true fracture zone. Understanding the distribution of these fractures will help to enable the future design of implants and devices to stabilize the fractures that require fixation. Copyright © 2023 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.09.035