Outcomes are Compromised When Revising Patellofemoral Arthroplasties for Patellar Component Failures.

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 18. Bone Jt Open. 2022 Aug;3(8):656-665. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.38.BJO-2021-0214.R1. Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a five-year prospective, multicentre, survivorship study. Tran T(1), McEwen P(2), Peng Y(3), Trivett A(1), Steele R(1), Donnelly W(4), Clark G(5)(6). Author information: (1)Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. (2)Mater Hospital Pimlico, Townsville, Queensland, Australia. (3)South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. (4)Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. (5)Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. (6)St John of God Subiaco, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. AIMS: The mid-term results of kinematic alignment (KA) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using image derived instrumentation (IDI) have not been reported in detail, and questions remain regarding ligamentous stability and revisions. This paper aims to address the following: 1) what is the distribution of alignment of KA TKAs using IDI; 2) is a TKA alignment category associated with increased risk of failure or poor patient outcomes; 3) does extending limb alignment lead to changes in soft-tissue laxity; and 4) what is the five-year survivorship and outcomes of KA TKA using IDI? METHODS: A prospective, multicentre, trial enrolled 100 patients undergoing KA TKA using IDI, with follow-up to five years. Alignment measures were conducted pre- and postoperatively to assess constitutional alignment and final implant position. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of pain and function were also included. The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Arthroplasty Registry was used to assess survivorship. RESULTS: The postoperative HKA distribution varied from 9° varus to 11° valgus. All PROMs showed statistical improvements at one year (p < 0.001), with further improvements at five years for Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score symptoms (p = 0.041) and Forgotten Joint Score (p = 0.011). Correlation analysis showed no difference (p = 0.610) between the hip-knee-ankle and joint line congruence angle at one and five years. Sub-group analysis showed no difference in PROMs for patients placed within 3° of neutral compared to those placed > 3°. There were no revisions for tibial loosening; however, there were reports of a higher incidence of poor patella tracking and patellofemoral stiffness. CONCLUSION: PROMs were not impacted by postoperative alignment category. Ligamentous stability was maintained at five years with joint line obliquity. There were no revisions for tibial loosening despite a significant portion of tibiae placed in varus; however, KA executed with IDI resulted in a higher than anticipated rate of patella complications.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(8):656-665. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.38.BJO-2021-0214.R1 PMCID: PMC9422905