Milch / Jakob–Weiss — Lateral Condyle Humerus Fractures

Open Full Wiki Practice MCQs

Overview

Topic summary

View wiki

Milch Type I: Fracture line lateral to trochlear groove (through capitellum–trochlear junction) — more stable. Milch Type II: Fracture line extends into trochlea — less stable (risk of displacement). Jakob/Weiss Displacement Staging: I (<2 mm, intact cartilage), II (≥2 mm with intact hinge), III (≥2 mm with rotation/complete displacement). Treatment: Stage I cast; Stage II–III typically ORIF/CRPP to prevent nonunion and lateral overgrowth.

Cases

Clinical case discussions

Browse all cases

Case

Monteggia fracture - Case Based Discussion

Introduction Monteggia fracture refers to a fracture of the proximal or middle third of the ulna associated with dislocation of the radial head a...

MCQs

High-yield practice questions

Start topic quiz

Question 1

What characterizes a Milch Type I fracture of the lateral condyle of the humerus?

Question 2

In the Jakob-Weiss classification, what does Stage I indicate?

Question 3

What is the primary treatment approach for Jakob-Weiss Stage II and III fractures?

Question 4

What is a critical reason why lateral condyle fractures are challenging to assess radiologically?

Question 5

What is the consequence of inadequate treatment of a lateral condyle fracture?

Question 6

Which of the following is true regarding Milch Type II fractures?

Question 7

For a lateral condyle fracture, which anatomical structure is primarily at risk due to the pull of the common extensor origin?

Question 8

What is the typical age range for children who most commonly experience lateral condyle fractures?

Question 9

What is one reason the fragment in lateral condyle fractures can rotate significantly?

Question 10

Which type of imaging may be necessary to accurately assess the displacement of a lateral condyle fracture?