Lenke classification guides fusion levels using curve type, lumbar modifier, and sagittal modifier. Bracing is effective in skeletally immature (Risser 0–2) with 25–40° curves when worn adequately. PSF with pedicle screws is gold standard for surgical AIS; selective fusion aims to preserve motion segments. Assess sagittal profile to avoid hypokyphosis and junctional problems. Psychosocial support and cosmesis discussion are important in counseling.
10 AI-generated high-yield questions by our AI engine
Overview & Epidemiology
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional structural deformity of the spine defined as a lateral spinal curvature of 10° or more (Cobb angle) with no identifiable underlying cause in patients aged 10 years to skeletal maturity. It is the most common form of scoliosis and a significant source of morbidity if untreated in progressive curves. Timely intervention with bracing or surgery can prevent progression and the need for more complex reconstructive surgery in adulthood.
Prevalence: 2–3% of the adolescent population has curves >10°; significant curves (>20°) affect approximately 0.3–0.5%
Female:male ratio for progressive curves: approximately 7–8:1 — girls far more likely to progress to surgical threshold
Aetiology: genuinely idiopathic — multifactorial genetic predisposition; multiple candidate genes identified; no single causative mechanism established
Most common curve pattern: right thoracic curve (Lenke 1) — convexity to the right in thoracic spine
Prognosis for progression determined by: magnitude of curve at presentation, skeletal maturity (Risser grade), curve pattern, and age at onset — younger patient + larger curve + lower Risser = highest progression risk
Pulmonary compromise: clinically significant in curves >70°; severe in curves >100° — thoracic scoliosis reduces lung volume by approximately 20 mL per degree of curvature beyond 70°
Assessment of Skeletal Maturity
Skeletal maturity assessment is the cornerstone of management decisions in AIS. Remaining growth determines progression risk and urgency of treatment.
Risser Grade
Description
Significance
0
No iliac crest apophysis visible
Highest risk of progression — maximum growth remaining
1
25% apophysis ossification (lateral)
High progression risk
2
50% ossification
Moderate risk; bracing still effective
3
75% ossification
Low progression risk; approaching maturity
4
100% ossification; apophysis not fused
Minimal progression risk
5
Apophysis fused to ilium
Skeletal maturity achieved — progression very unlikely
Sanders classification (hand/wrist skeletal age): more sensitive for predicting peak height velocity and progression risk than Risser alone — Tanner-Whitehouse staging; particularly useful in early adolescence
Tanner staging and menarche: girls experience peak curve progression in the 1–2 years before menarche; post-menarche girls rarely progress beyond 30°
Triradiate cartilage closure: closed triradiate cartilage on pelvic X-ray correlates with Risser 0–1 transition and imminent peak height velocity
Lenke Classification
The Lenke classification (2001) is the standard system for describing AIS curve patterns and guides surgical fusion level selection.
Lenke Type
Curve Pattern
Structural Criteria
1
Main thoracic (MT) only
MT structural; proximal thoracic and lumbar non-structural
2
Double thoracic
MT + proximal thoracic both structural
3
Double major
MT + lumbar both structural
4
Triple major
Proximal thoracic + MT + lumbar all structural
5
Thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) only
TL/L structural; thoracic non-structural
6
TL/L main + structural thoracic
TL/L major; MT also structural
Each Lenke type has a lumbar modifier (A, B, C — based on lumbar curve relationship to CSVL) and a sagittal modifier (–, N, +)
A structural curve must be fused; a non-structural (compensatory) curve need not be included in fusion — preserving motion segments is a key surgical goal
Structural definition: >25° on side-bending X-ray OR >20° kyphosis in thoracic region
Management Algorithm
Management is guided by Cobb angle magnitude and skeletal maturity. The three treatment options are observation, bracing, and surgery.
Cobb Angle
Risser / Maturity
Recommendation
<20°
Any
Observation only; repeat X-ray every 4–6 months
20–40°
Risser 0–2 (skeletally immature)
Bracing — proven to reduce progression to surgical threshold
20–40°
Risser 3–5 (near or at maturity)
Observation; bracing less effective at skeletal maturity
>40–45°
Skeletally immature
Surgical correction strongly recommended — will progress after maturity
>50°
Any
Surgery — curves >50° continue to progress in adulthood at 1° per year
Bracing
Goal of bracing: prevent curve progression to surgical threshold — does not correct existing curve; aims to hold curve magnitude until skeletal maturity
BrAIST trial (Weinstein, NEJM 2013): bracing significantly reduces progression to surgical threshold — 72% success rate with bracing vs 48% in observation for curves 20–40° in Risser 0–2 patients; dose-response relationship — more hours = better outcomes
Dosage: minimum 18 hours/day for maximal effectiveness; 13+ hours shows dose-response benefit; compliance is the primary determinant of success
Weaning: brace weaning begins at Risser 4; completed by Risser 5 or 2 years post-menarche in girls
Monitoring: clinical and radiographic reassessment every 4–6 months during bracing; in-brace Cobb should show correction of 50% or more — poor in-brace correction predicts failure
Surgical Management
Posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation is the gold standard surgical treatment for AIS. The goal is to achieve a balanced, level fusion with maximum correction while preserving as many motion segments as possible.
Approach: posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with pedicle screw and rod instrumentation — hybrid constructs (hooks/wires) still used in some centres but pedicle screws provide superior three-column fixation and correction
Fusion levels: determined by Lenke classification and end vertebra levels — fuse from upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) to lower instrumented vertebra (LIV); include all structural curves; the stable and neutral vertebra concept guides distal fusion level selection
Stable vertebra: most cephalad vertebra bisected by CSVL (central sacral vertical line) on standing AP — this is the lowest level that should be fused for lumbar curves
Correction techniques: rod derotation, in situ rod bending, vertebral column manipulation, direct vertebral rotation (DVR) — achieve coronal and sagittal correction simultaneously
Anterior approach: anterior spinal fusion (ASF) via VATS (thoracoscopic) or open thoracotomy — fewer fusion levels needed for thoracic curves; anterior release for rigid curves >70°; less commonly used now with advances in posterior technique
Expected correction: posterior fusion achieves approximately 60–70% coronal correction of Cobb angle with modern pedicle screw constructs
Neurological Monitoring & Complications
Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM): combined SSEP (somatosensory evoked potentials) + MEP (motor evoked potentials) — mandatory for all AIS correction surgery; significant signal change warrants immediate wake-up test or reversal of correction
Wake-up test (Stagnara): intraoperative arousal to confirm lower limb neurological function; reserved for when IONM signals are inconclusive or unavailable
Neurological injury: incidence approximately 0.5–1% with modern monitoring; most resolve; permanent paraplegia extremely rare (<0.1%)
Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK): kyphosis developing above UIV after surgery; incidence 5–40%; related to UIV selection and sagittal balance; symptomatic PJK requires revision
Crankshaft phenomenon: rotation and bending of fused posterior elements due to continued anterior growth in skeletally immature patients — prevented by anterior epiphysiodesis or anterior fusion in young patients (Risser 0, open triradiate cartilage)
Blood loss: significant in long fusions; cell salvage, tranexamic acid, and controlled hypotension are standard
Consultant-Level Considerations
Always exclude non-idiopathic causes before labelling as AIS: left thoracic curve (unusual), painful scoliosis, rapid progression, neurological signs, cafe-au-lait spots (neurofibromatosis), axillary freckling, abnormal reflexes, or hairy patch (diastematomyelia) — any atypical feature warrants MRI of the whole spine before treatment
Syrinx (syringomyelia) is the most common finding on MRI in "AIS" with atypical features — present in up to 26% of left thoracic curves; requires neurosurgical referral before spinal surgery
Distal fusion level selection: stopping too short risks adding-on phenomenon (progression of unfused curve below LIV); stopping too long sacrifices motion segments unnecessarily — careful pre-operative planning with traction X-rays helps define compensatory curve flexibility
Sagittal balance: thoracic hypokyphosis is common in AIS — restoration of normal sagittal profile (>20° thoracic kyphosis) is as important as coronal correction; flat back after surgery leads to poor clinical outcomes
Growing rods for young children with progressive scoliosis: magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) used for early onset scoliosis (<10 years); allow repeated distraction without open surgery; delayed definitive fusion until growth complete
Bracing: >18 hours/day; effective for 20–40° curves in Risser 0–2 patients — BrAIST trial proven
Surgery: >45° in skeletally immature; >50° in any patient — curves >50° progress 1° per year in adulthood
Lenke 1 = right main thoracic curve = most common AIS pattern
Left thoracic curve or atypical features = MRI whole spine before treatment; exclude syrinx, tethered cord, tumour
IONM: combined SSEP + MEP mandatory; significant change = wake-up test or correct
Crankshaft phenomenon: continued anterior growth rotates posterior fusion; prevent with anterior epiphysiodesis in Risser 0 with open triradiate cartilage
Stable vertebra = most cephalad vertebra bisected by CSVL = guide to distal fusion level
Proximal junctional kyphosis: common complication after long fusion — related to UIV selection and sagittal balance restoration
Pulmonary compromise: significant beyond 70°; severe beyond 100° — thoracic curves reduce lung volume ~20 mL per degree
10 AI-generated high-yield questions by our AI engine
References
Weinstein SL et al. Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (BrAIST trial). N Engl J Med. 2013;369(16):1512–1521.
Lenke LG et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(8):1169–1181.
Risser JC. The iliac apophysis: an invaluable sign in the management of scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1958;11:111–119.
Sanders JO et al. Predicting scoliosis progression from skeletal maturity: a simplified classification during adolescence. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(3):540–553.
Suk SI et al. Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1995;20(12):1399–1405.
Kakar S et al. Neuromonitoring in scoliosis surgery: current status and implications. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010.
Hilibrand AS et al. The use of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials during scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998.
Campbells Operative Orthopaedics. 14th Edition. Elsevier.
Bridwell KH, DeWald RL. The Textbook of Spinal Surgery. 3rd Edition. Lippincott.
Orthobullets — Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
SRS (Scoliosis Research Society) — AIS Guidelines and Evidence-Based Recommendations. srs.org.