Orthonotes Logo
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories

Amputation — Levels & Prosthetics

5 Views

Category: General

Share Wiki QR Card Download Slides (.pptx)
Level selection balances wound healing potential, prosthetic energy cost, and function. Upper limb: transmetacarpal, wrist disarticulation, trans‑radial, elbow disarticulation, trans‑humeral, shoulder disarticulation. Lower limb: Syme, transtibial (BKA), knee disarticulation, transfemoral (AKA), hip disarticulation/hemipelvectomy. Flap design: long posterior flap (BKA), myodesis over myoplasty for power and stability. Prosthetics: suspension (suction, pin‑lock), sockets (PTB, TSB), feet (SACH, dynamic response), knees (polycentric, microprocessor).
Published Feb 28, 2026 • Author: The Bone Stories ✅
🧠 Test Yourself with OrthoMind AI

10 AI-generated high-yield questions by our AI engine



Overview & Indications

Amputation is the surgical removal of a limb or part of a limb, performed when the limb is non-salvageable, non-functional, or represents a greater threat to the patient`s life than its removal. Far from representing surgical failure, a well-planned amputation at the correct level, followed by excellent prosthetic rehabilitation, often returns the patient to a higher functional level than a failed limb salvage attempt. The choice of amputation level is the most critical surgical decision — it determines the energy cost of walking with a prosthesis, the prosthetic options available, and the rehabilitation potential.

  • Indications for amputation: (1) Vascular — peripheral arterial disease (PAD) with critical ischaemia and non-reconstructable disease; diabetic foot with gangrene; (2) Trauma — unsalvageable limb (Gustilo IIIC with non-reconstructable vascular injury; mangled extremity); the LEAP study (Lower Extremity Assessment Project) demonstrated equivalent functional outcomes between amputation and limb salvage for severe lower extremity injuries at 2-year follow-up — the decision between limb salvage and amputation should not be based on scoring systems alone; (3) Tumour — malignant bone or soft tissue tumours not amenable to limb salvage; (4) Infection — uncontrolled life-threatening sepsis (gas gangrene, necrotising fasciitis) not responding to debridement; (5) Congenital deformity — non-functional limb or planned amputation to facilitate superior prosthetic fitting
  • Mangled extremity scoring systems: the Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) assesses skeletal/soft tissue injury (1–4), limb ischaemia (1–6), shock (0–2), and patient age (0–2); MESS ≥7 = high likelihood of amputation; however scoring systems are NOT absolute — they guide but do not replace clinical judgement; the LEAP study showed MESS poorly predicted functional outcomes
Amputation Levels — Lower Limb
Level Description Prosthetic Options Key Considerations
Syme`s amputation Disarticulation through the ankle joint with preservation of the heel pad; the heel pad (a tough, specialised weight-bearing skin) is transposed to cover the distal tibia stump; the malleoli may be trimmed to reduce the bulbous stump profile End-bearing stump — the patient can walk short distances without a prosthesis (on the stump itself); low-profile prosthetic foot; good cosmesis challenge due to bulbous stump Best level for diabetic foot salvage; preserves maximum limb length; end-bearing capacity unique advantage; requires intact heel pad vascularity (posterior tibial artery must be patent); poor cosmesis (bulbous stump)
Below-knee (BK) / Transtibial (TT) Amputation through the tibial shaft; the ideal stump length is the distal 1/3 of the tibia at approximately 12–15 cm from the tibial tuberosity; the fibula is divided slightly shorter than the tibia (1–2 cm) to avoid fibular prominence; long posterior myocutaneous flap (Burgess flap) is the standard closure technique — gastrocnemius-soleus muscle and posterior skin provide excellent padding over the distal stump Endoskeletal pylon with prosthetic foot; modern energy-storing carbon fibre feet (Flex-Foot, Össur Cheetah); microprocessor ankles; wide range of high-performance prosthetics available The ideal functional lower limb amputation level; preserves the knee joint (the single most important determinant of walking energy cost and rehabilitation success); energy cost of walking with TT prosthesis ~25–40% above normal; 80–90% of transtibial amputees achieve community-level ambulation
Knee disarticulation (KD) Disarticulation through the knee joint; the femoral condyles are preserved; provides a long end-bearing stump with excellent proprioception; the patella is retained and sutures to provide anterior padding Specialised KD prosthetic knee joints; the bulbous femoral condyles create cosmetic challenges with prosthetic fitting; polycentric prosthetic knees required to maintain equal knee centre height Preferred over above-knee (AK) in children (preserves the distal femoral physis — allows continued bone growth); provides excellent suspension and proprioception; less commonly performed in adults due to prosthetic challenges; better rehabilitation potential than AK due to longer lever arm and end-bearing capacity
Above-knee (AK) / Transfemoral (TF) Amputation through the femoral shaft; ideal stump length 50–65% of the femoral length (approximately 10–12 cm above the knee joint level); adductor myodesis (suturing the adductor muscles to the lateral femur) maintains adductor pull and prevents abduction contracture and hip flexion deformity — critical for prosthetic fitting; equal anterior and posterior myocutaneous flaps Prosthetic knee joints: mechanical (single-axis, polycentric), hydraulic, microprocessor-controlled (C-Leg, Rheo Knee — stance and swing phase control); prosthetic foot; socket fit is critical; ischial weight-bearing socket or total surface-bearing socket The knee is lost — dramatically increases rehabilitation challenge and energy cost; energy cost of walking with TF prosthesis ~65–100% above normal; only 50–60% of TF amputees achieve community-level ambulation; adductor myodesis is the most critical technical step — prevents the stump falling into abduction which makes prosthetic fitting impossible; hip flexion and abduction contracture are the worst complications
Hip disarticulation Disarticulation through the hip joint; the entire femur is removed; performed for proximal femoral tumours, extensive trauma, or severe proximal vascular disease Canadian hip disarticulation prosthesis; hip, knee, and ankle units; extremely high energy cost of ambulation; many patients choose wheelchair over prosthetic walking Energy cost of ambulation is very high (~100–125% above normal); only highly motivated young patients achieve functional prosthetic ambulation; most patients with hip disarticulation from trauma or tumour achieve best function with a wheelchair and a cosmetic prosthesis
Amputation Levels — Upper Limb
Level Prosthetic Options Key Points
Digit / partial hand Cosmetic or functional prosthetic digits (silicone); myoelectric fingers (i-Limb) Preserve maximum length; replantation preferred for thumb and multiple digit amputations if viable; even a short thumb stump is more functional than a prosthesis
Below-elbow / Transradial (TR) Body-powered hook (Hosmer); myoelectric hand (Ottobock); hybrid; activity-specific terminal devices Preserve maximum length; even a very short transradial stump (3–4 cm) is functionally superior to a transhumeral amputation (pronation/supination is partially preserved); myoelectric prostheses are the modern standard for upper limb amputees
Above-elbow / Transhumeral (TH) Myoelectric elbow + hand; body-powered cable-driven system; microprocessor elbow Loss of elbow dramatically reduces prosthetic function; elbow disarticulation preferred over short TH stump for prosthetic fitting; the elbow joint provides prosthetic anchoring
Forequarter / Shoulder disarticulation Cosmetic shoulder cap ± passive or myoelectric arm; most patients choose cosmesis over functional prosthesis at this level Performed for proximal upper extremity sarcomas or catastrophic vascular injuries; body-powered prosthetics achieve limited function; cosmesis is often the primary goal
Surgical Principles & Stump Construction
  • Stump length: `preserve as much length as possible` within the constraints of adequate vascularity, soft tissue coverage, and prosthetic requirements; the minimum functional stump lengths are: transtibial — 5 cm of tibia below the tibial tuberosity (8–12 cm is ideal — long posterior flap technique allows longer stumps than equal flaps); transfemoral — 10 cm below the lesser trochanter; the stump must be long enough to provide a lever arm for prosthetic control
  • Myodesis vs myoplasty: myodesis = direct muscle attachment to bone (drill holes through the cortex to suture the muscle); provides better muscle control and proprioception; prevents retraction of muscles; myoplasty = suturing muscles to each other over the bone end (muscle to muscle); less rigid fixation; myodesis is preferred for transfemoral amputation (adductor myodesis is critical); both techniques are used in transtibial amputation
  • Nerve management: all major nerves should be identified, put under gentle tension, and sharply divided — they are allowed to retract proximally into soft tissue away from the stump end; this reduces the risk of painful neuroma formation; do NOT tie or cauterise the nerve — these techniques increase neuroma pain; a `traction neurectomy` (gentle pull + sharp cut) allows the nerve end to retract into a soft tissue bed away from the prosthetic socket contact area
  • Bone management: sharp bone edges are bevelled and smoothed with a rasp to prevent pressure sores under the prosthetic socket; the tibia is bevelled anteriorly at approximately 45° at the stump end; the fibula is cut 1–2 cm shorter than the tibia to avoid fibular prominence; the bone end must be covered with healthy muscle and skin — never allow bone to contact the skin directly
Prosthetics & Rehabilitation
  • Energy cost of walking (O2 consumption above normal): partial foot ~10%; Syme`s ~15%; transtibial ~25–40%; knee disarticulation ~50%; transfemoral ~65–100%; hip disarticulation ~100–125%; bilateral transtibial ~41%; bilateral transfemoral ~280%; these figures demonstrate why preservation of the knee joint is the single most important goal in lower limb amputation surgery — the energy cost increase between transtibial and transfemoral is enormous; elderly patients with cardiovascular disease may not have the cardiorespiratory reserve to ambulate at the energy cost of a transfemoral amputation
  • Prosthetic categories — lower limb: (1) Energy-storing/returning (ESR) feet — carbon fibre blade design; store energy in stance and release it at push-off (e.g., Össur Vari-Flex, Ottobock Taleo Carbon); allow running and sports; (2) Microprocessor knees (MPK — for transfemoral amputees) — C-Leg (Ottobock), Rheo Knee (Össur); hydraulic microprocessor-controlled stance and swing phase; dramatically reduce falls and improve community ambulation; (3) Osseointegration — titanium implant anchored in the residual bone; the prosthesis attaches directly to the implant (percutaneous abutment); eliminates socket fit problems; allows direct osseous feedback (osseoperception); growing evidence for improved function and quality of life
  • Phantom limb pain: experienced by 50–80% of amputees; the sensation of pain in the absent limb; distinguished from phantom sensation (non-painful awareness of the absent limb) and residual limb (stump) pain; managed with: mirror therapy (most evidence-based conservative approach); graded motor imagery; gabapentinoids; amitriptyline; TENS; ketamine infusions in refractory cases; early prosthetic fitting reduces phantom pain
Exam Pearls
  • Most important principle: preserve the knee joint; transtibial (BK) vs transfemoral (AK) is the most critical amputation decision; energy cost of TT = 25–40% above normal; AK = 65–100% above normal; elderly/vascular patients may not achieve ambulation at AK energy cost
  • Syme`s amputation: ankle disarticulation preserving the heel pad; end-bearing; patient can walk on stump without prosthesis; ideal for diabetic foot with patent posterior tibial artery; bulbous stump = cosmetic challenge
  • Transtibial ideal stump: 12–15 cm from tibial tuberosity; fibula 1–2 cm shorter; long posterior myocutaneous flap (Burgess); tibia bevelled anteriorly; adductor myodesis NOT required (transfemoral only)
  • Transfemoral adductor myodesis: the most critical technical step; prevents abduction and flexion contracture of the stump; without myodesis, the adductors retract and the stump falls into abduction making socket fitting impossible; suture adductors to drill holes in the lateral femur under physiological tension
  • Nerve management: traction neurectomy — gentle tension + sharp cut = nerve retracts into soft tissue; prevents painful neuroma formation at the stump end; never tie, cauterise, or leave nerve at the bone end
  • LEAP study: equivalent functional outcomes between amputation and limb salvage for severe lower extremity injuries at 2 years; MESS score poorly predicted outcomes; decision should be individualised, not based on scoring alone
  • Energy storing feet: carbon fibre ESR feet for active amputees; store energy at heel strike, release at toe-off; allow running (Cheetah blade, Flex-Run); microprocessor knees (C-Leg) reduce falls in TF amputees
  • Phantom limb pain: 50–80% of amputees; mirror therapy has strongest evidence for conservative management; gabapentinoids; graded motor imagery; distinguish from stump pain (local stump pathology — neuroma, infection, bone spur)
  • Knee disarticulation preferred over short TF in children: preserves distal femoral physis; allows continued femoral growth; prevents the stump-shortening problem of physeal ablation in long bone amputations in skeletally immature patients
🧠 Test Yourself with OrthoMind AI

10 AI-generated high-yield questions by our AI engine

References

Burgess EM et al. Amputations of the leg for peripheral vascular insufficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971.
Gottschalk FA. Transfemoral amputation — biomechanics and surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999.
Johansen K et al. Objective criteria accurately predict amputation following lower extremity trauma — MESS score. J Trauma. 1990.
Bosse MJ et al. LEAP study — an analysis of outcomes of reconstruction or amputation after leg-threatening injuries. NEJM. 2002;347(24):1924–1931.
Hagberg K, Branemark R. Consequences of non-vascular trans-femoral amputation — a survey of quality of life, prosthetic use and problems. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2001.
Ziegler-Graham K et al. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008.
Ebrahimzadeh MH et al. Phantom limb pain. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2017.
Campbells Operative Orthopaedics. 14th Edition. Elsevier.
Orthobullets — Amputations; Below-Knee Amputation; Above-Knee Amputation; Prosthetics.
BACPAR Guidelines — Prosthetic Rehabilitation. British Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Amputee Rehabilitation.