Orthonotes
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories
v4.1 Fusion X
v4.1 Fusion X
Trauma 518 views 1,260 words 6 min read

Frykman Classification — Distal Radius

Key Takeaway
Types I–VIII: extra- vs intra-articular, DRUJ involvement, and ulnar styloid fracture. Intra-articular (III–VIII) have higher arthritis risk; often require ORIF.
Published Feb 28, 2026 Updated Sep 15, 2026 By The Bone Stories Admin
Overview — Distal Radius Fractures & Classification

Distal radius fractures are the most common fractures in adults, accounting for approximately 17% of all fractures presenting to emergency departments. They occur across the full age spectrum — from high-energy injuries in young adults to low-energy osteoporotic fractures in elderly women (who have a lifetime risk of approximately 15% for a distal radius fracture). The distal radius bears approximately 80% of the axial load through the wrist (the remaining 20% transmitted through the ulna via the TFCC), and disruption of its articular surface, inclination, and length directly affects wrist function and predicts the development of post-traumatic wrist arthritis. Multiple classification systems exist for distal radius fractures; the Frykman classification (1967) was historically the most commonly used and remains important for examinations, although the AO/OTA classification and the Melone classification are more comprehensive and have largely superseded Frykman in modern research.

  • Historical context: the term `Colles fracture` (Abraham Colles, 1814) describes the classic distal radius fracture with dorsal displacement (the classic `dinner fork deformity`); `Smith fracture` = volar displacement (the reverse Colles); `Barton fracture` = an intra-articular fracture-dislocation of the distal radius involving the dorsal or volar rim; `Chauffeur`s fracture` (Hutchinson fracture) = an intra-articular fracture of the radial styloid from a direct blow; these eponyms remain in common clinical use
  • Radiological parameters of the distal radius: normal measurements that must be restored with reduction or fixation; (1) Radial inclination: 22–23° (measured on AP view — the angle between the radial styloid and the ulnar corner of the radius); (2) Radial height (length): 11–12 mm (the distance from the tip of the radial styloid to the level of the ulnar corner of the distal radius on AP view — a measure of the radial shortening); (3) Volar tilt (palmar tilt): 11–12° (measured on the lateral view — the normal volar tilt of the articular surface); loss of volar tilt (neutral or dorsal tilt) indicates Colles-type deformity; excessive volar tilt indicates Smith-type deformity; (4) Ulnar variance: the relative length of the ulna compared to the radius (normally neutral or slightly negative — the ulna is at or slightly shorter than the radius); positive ulnar variance (ulna longer than radius) from radial shortening predicts TFCC injury and ulnar impaction syndrome
Frykman Classification

The Frykman classification grades distal radius fractures according to TWO factors: (1) whether the fracture involves the radiocarpal joint (intra-articular vs extra-articular); and (2) whether there is an associated distal ulna fracture. Fractures involving the DRUJ (distal radioulnar joint) are also incorporated. The even-numbered types indicate the presence of an associated distal ulna fracture; the odd-numbered types indicate no ulnar fracture. The system has eight types (I–VIII) arranged in order of increasing severity.

Frykman Type Radiocarpal Joint DRUJ Distal Ulna Fracture Description
I Extra-articular Uninvolved No Classic extra-articular distal radius fracture (Colles type) without any ulnar fracture; the simplest and most favourable type; the radiocarpal and DRUJ articular surfaces are both intact
II Extra-articular Uninvolved YES Same as Type I but WITH an associated distal ulna fracture (ulnar styloid or distal ulna body fracture); the even number = ulnar fracture is present
III Intra-articular (radiocarpal only) Uninvolved No Intra-articular fracture involving the RADIOCARPAL joint (the articular surface between the distal radius and the scaphoid/lunate) WITHOUT DRUJ involvement; the DRUJ articular surface is intact; no ulnar fracture
IV Intra-articular (radiocarpal only) Uninvolved YES Same as Type III with associated distal ulna fracture
V Extra-articular (radiocarpal) Involved (DRUJ) No Extra-articular radiocarpal fracture BUT with DRUJ involvement (the fracture extends into the distal radioulnar joint articular surface — the sigmoid notch of the radius); the DRUJ surface is disrupted
VI Extra-articular (radiocarpal) Involved YES Same as Type V with distal ulna fracture
VII Intra-articular (BOTH radiocarpal AND DRUJ) Involved No Both the RADIOCARPAL AND the DRUJ articular surfaces are disrupted; the fracture involves both joints; no distal ulna fracture; the most complex intra-articular pattern without ulnar involvement
VIII Intra-articular (BOTH) Involved YES The MOST COMPLEX Frykman type — BOTH joints involved (radiocarpal + DRUJ) + distal ulna fracture; all three elements are present; requires the most complex surgical reconstruction
  • Frykman memory aids: ODD numbers = no distal ulna fracture; EVEN numbers = WITH distal ulna fracture; Types I-II = extra-articular radiocarpal; III-IV = intra-articular radiocarpal only; V-VI = extra-articular radiocarpal + DRUJ; VII-VIII = both joints intra-articular; increasing type number = increasing severity; Type VIII = the most severe
Limitations of the Frykman Classification
  • The Frykman system has several important limitations that have led to its partial replacement by the AO/OTA and Melone systems: (1) it does NOT describe displacement (the degree of dorsal or volar tilt, radial shortening, or intra-articular step-off — all of which are the most important prognostic factors); (2) it does NOT distinguish between the various patterns of articular comminution (the number of intra-articular fragments, the location of the articular depression, etc.); (3) it has poor inter-observer reliability; (4) it does not guide surgical treatment beyond the distinction intra-articular vs extra-articular; despite these limitations, the Frykman system is important for examinations and remains in wide clinical use for communication
Indications for Operative vs Non-Operative Management
  • Acceptable position for non-operative management: multiple thresholds have been proposed; the most commonly cited (based on guidelines from the British Society for Surgery of the Hand, AAOS, etc.): (1) Dorsal tilt ≤10° on lateral view (OR volar tilt up to −10°, i.e. some dorsal tilt is accepted); (2) Radial shortening (loss of radial height) ≤3–5 mm; (3) Intra-articular step-off ≤2 mm; (4) Radial inclination ≥15°; young active patients generally require stricter criteria than elderly low-demand patients; Colles fractures in elderly patients with significant osteoporosis may be managed non-operatively even with moderate displacement if the patient`s activity level is low
  • Surgical options: (1) Volar locking plate (VLP — Synthes DVR, Acumed, Trimed) — the current gold standard for most displaced distal radius fractures requiring ORIF; the volar approach (between flexor carpi radialis and the radial artery) provides access to the volar cortex; locking screws in the distal fragment are directed dorsally within the subchondral bone; angular stability allows early mobilisation; (2) External fixation — for severe comminution or open fractures; (3) Dorsal plating — for isolated dorsal rim fractures (Barton variants) or when the volar approach is not suitable; (4) Fragment-specific fixation — for complex multi-part intra-articular fractures; each fragment is addressed with a dedicated pin, screw, or small plate
Exam Pearls
  • Frykman mnemonic: odd = no ulnar fracture; even = ulnar fracture; I/II = extra-articular radiocarpal; III/IV = intra-articular radiocarpal only; V/VI = extra-articular radiocarpal + DRUJ; VII/VIII = both joints; VIII = most severe
  • Normal radiological parameters: radial inclination ~22°; radial height ~12 mm; volar tilt ~11°; ulnar variance = neutral; restoration of these parameters is the goal of treatment
  • Frykman limitation: does NOT describe displacement; cannot predict prognosis or guide treatment beyond intra/extra-articular distinction; AO/OTA and Melone are more comprehensive; Frykman remains important for examinations but has been superseded in research
  • Colles fracture: distal radius fracture with dorsal displacement and dorsal tilt (the classic elderly osteoporotic wrist fracture from a fall onto outstretched hand); Smith fracture = volar displacement; Barton = intra-articular rim fracture-dislocation; Chauffeur`s (Hutchinson) = radial styloid intra-articular
  • Operative indications: dorsal tilt >10°; radial shortening >5 mm; intra-articular step-off >2 mm; age-adjusted (younger = stricter criteria); irreducible or re-displaced after reduction; volar locking plate (VLP) is the gold standard ORIF technique
  • PRWE and DASH outcome scores: the two most commonly used patient-reported outcome measures for distal radius fractures; PRWE (Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation); DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand); used in research to compare operative vs non-operative outcomes
  • TFCC injury with distal radius fractures: positive ulnar variance (radial shortening) increases ulnar loading → TFCC injury → DRUJ instability; assess DRUJ stability after fixation of the distal radius; if DRUJ is unstable after fracture fixation → TFCC repair or DRUJ stabilisation; if ulnar styloid fracture is large (involving the base) → likelihood of DRUJ instability is higher and requires surgical treatment

References

Frykman G. Fracture of the distal radius including sequelae — shoulder-hand-finger syndrome, disturbance in the distal radio-ulnar joint and impairment of nerve function. A clinical and experimental study. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1967;108:1–155.
Fernandez DL. Distal radius fracture — the rationale of a classification. Handchirurgie. 1987.
Melone CP Jr. Articular fractures of the distal radius. Orthop Clin North Am. 1984.
Chung KC et al. Treatment of unstable distal radial fractures with the volar locking plating system. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006.
Mackenney PJ et al. Prediction of instability in distal radial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006.
Campbells Operative Orthopaedics. 14th Edition. Elsevier.
Orthobullets — Distal Radius Fractures; Frykman Classification; Volar Locking Plate; Radial Parameters; DRUJ Injury.

Linked Evidence

Indexed papers linked to this topic for quick evidence review.

Search More Evidence

No evidence has been linked to this topic yet.

YOUR ORTHONOTES

Personalize Orthonotes for you

Create a free account and tell us what you're learning. We'll personalize ONE Dashboard around your goals.

Get Started Free →

Already have an account? Log in