Orthonotes Logo
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories

PCL Injuries — Diagnosis & Management

4 Views

Category: Sports

Share Wiki QR Card Download Slides (.pptx)
PCL resists posterior tibial translation. Mechanism: dashboard injury, fall on flexed knee with foot plantarflexed. Clinical: posterior sag sign, posterior drawer test, quadriceps active test. Isolated low-grade PCL often treated nonoperatively. High-grade or multi-ligament injuries need reconstruction.
Published Feb 28, 2026 • Author: The Bone Stories ✅
🧠 Test Yourself with OrthoMind AI

10 AI-generated high-yield questions by our AI engine



Overview & Anatomy

The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is the strongest ligament in the knee — approximately 1.3–2× as thick and twice as strong as the ACL — yet it is less frequently injured. It courses from the lateral aspect of the medial femoral condyle in the intercondylar notch to the posterior aspect of the tibial plateau, approximately 1 cm below the articular surface. Its primary function is to resist posterior tibial translation relative to the femur; it also provides secondary restraint to varus, valgus, and external rotation. PCL injuries occur in approximately 3–20% of all knee ligament injuries and are frequently associated with other ligamentous injuries (combined in 85% of cases). Isolated PCL injuries often go unrecognised — their natural history and the indications for surgical reconstruction remain more controversial than for ACL injuries.

  • PCL anatomy — two bundles: the anterolateral bundle (ALB) — larger, primary bundle; tight in flexion; the main restraint to posterior tibial translation at 90° flexion; the posteromedial bundle (PMB) — smaller; tight in full extension; contributes to rotational stability; most PCL reconstructions aim to restore the ALB; double-bundle PCL reconstruction (restoring both ALB and PMB) is technically possible but evidence for superiority over single-bundle is limited; the PCL is extrasynovial but intracapsular (unlike the ACL which is intrasynovial); its extrasynovial position gives it a better blood supply and enhanced healing potential compared to the ACL — this is why isolated PCL injuries have a higher rate of satisfactory non-operative healing
  • Mechanisms of injury: (1) dashboard injury — the most common; a direct posteriorly directed force applied to the proximal anterior tibia with the knee flexed at 90° (e.g., knee hitting the dashboard in a motor vehicle collision); (2) fall on a flexed knee with the foot in plantarflexion; (3) hyperextension of the knee; (4) combined valgus/varus with rotation (associated multi-ligament injury); vehicular accidents account for ~45% and sports injuries ~40% of PCL tears
  • Associated injuries in PCL tears: isolated PCL injury occurs in only ~15% of cases; combined injuries (84.7%) most commonly include ACL (48.2%), posterolateral corner (PLC) structures (popliteus, popliteofibular ligament, lateral collateral ligament), posteromedial corner (PMC), and medial collateral ligament; knee dislocation carries a 25% incidence of nerve injury (common peroneal nerve most vulnerable — assess for foot drop) and 18% incidence of vascular injury (popliteal artery — must exclude with vascular assessment and CT angiography or ABI measurement)
Grading & Clinical Assessment
  • PCL injury grading (posterior tibial translation vs contralateral): Grade I (partial tear) — 1–5 mm increased posterior translation; tibia remains anterior to femoral condyles on lateral view; Grade II (complete isolated PCL tear) — 6–10 mm increased posterior tibial translation; tibia flush with or just posterior to femoral condyles; Grade III (complete PCL tear with associated ligamentous injury) — >10 mm posterior translation; tibia lies posterior to femoral condyles; Grade III virtually always indicates combined ligamentous injury (PLC, PMC, ACL, or multi-ligament knee injury); the grade determines management — Grade I–II isolated tears are predominantly managed non-operatively; Grade III or combined injuries are more likely to require surgical reconstruction
  • Clinical examination — key tests: (1) Posterior drawer test — the most sensitive and specific clinical test for PCL injury (sensitivity ~90%); with the knee at 90° flexion and foot stabilised, the examiner pushes the tibia posteriorly; increased posterior translation relative to the contralateral side indicates PCL injury; a positive posterior drawer test in the presence of a normal-feeling ACL (no anterior laxity on Lachman) suggests isolated PCL injury; (2) Posterior sag sign (Godfrey`s test) — with both hips and knees at 90° flexion in the supine patient, the PCL-deficient tibia sags posteriorly under gravity — the tibial tuberosity drops inferiorly relative to the contralateral side; (3) Quadriceps active test — with the knee at 90°, the patient contracts the quadriceps against resistance; in PCL deficiency the tibia reduces anteriorly from its posteriorly sagged position (the quadriceps pull the tibia anteriorly — this is diagnostic of PCL injury)
  • Assessment of posterior tibial sag: before performing the posterior drawer test, the examiner must establish whether the tibia is already posteriorly sagged (if sagged, even a normal anterior drawer could be misinterpreted as a positive ACL test — the `false-positive anterior drawer`); look for the posterior sag sign first; if present, the anterior draw is unreliable for ACL assessment until the sag is corrected
Investigations
  • Plain radiographs: AP and lateral knee; assess for tibial avulsion fracture at the PCL tibial insertion (a bony PCL avulsion is visible as a small flake of bone at the posterior tibia on the lateral view); Segond fracture (lateral tibial plateau avulsion — indicates ACL tear, not PCL); joint space for associated bone injury; stress radiographs (kneeling view — the patient kneels on the affected knee and a lateral X-ray is taken; gravity causes posterior tibial subluxation in PCL deficiency; posterior tibial translation ≥8 mm compared to contralateral knee = PCL deficiency; the Telos stress device is an alternative standardised method)
  • MRI — gold standard: accuracy 96–100% for PCL tears; sagittal T2-weighted images are the primary sequence; the normal PCL appears as a smooth, homogeneous, low-signal curved band; a torn PCL on MRI: (1) high T2 signal within the ligament substance (oedema/haemorrhage — acute injury); (2) apparent thickening — an AP diameter >7 mm on sagittal T2-weighted images is highly suggestive of a ruptured PCL (the torn ligament maintains continuity as a single thickened structure in 62% of acute tears — it does not gap like an ACL); (3) frank discontinuity (complete disruption — less common); (4) bony tibial avulsion — cortical flake at the posterior tibial insertion with retracted ligament; IMPORTANT: chronic PCL tears are easily missed on MRI — the ligament scars in continuity and may appear grossly intact despite functional laxity; quantitative T2 mapping and stress radiographs help in this scenario
  • CT: limited role for isolated PCL soft tissue injury; useful for characterising bony avulsion fractures (PCL tibial avulsion — size of bony fragment, degree of displacement, planning for ORIF); CT angiography for suspected vascular injury in knee dislocation
  • Vascular assessment in knee dislocation / high-grade PCL injury: ankle-brachial index (ABI) <0.9 = vascular injury requiring CTA; ABI >0.9 with normal pulses = low risk; popliteal artery injury can occur with a soft ABI (intimal tear without occlusion) — serial vascular assessment over 24–48 hours is prudent in high-energy injuries
Management
Grade Injury Pattern Management
Grade I–II isolated Partial or complete isolated PCL tear; tibia remains anterior to (or flush with) femoral condyles; no associated ligamentous injury; posterior translation <10 mm Non-operative — the cornerstone of management; the PCL has enhanced healing potential due to its extrasynovial blood supply; hinged knee brace in full extension (prevents posterior sag) for 4–6 weeks; quadriceps strengthening (quadriceps are the primary dynamic stabiliser against posterior tibial translation — they pull the tibia anteriorly); hamstring avoidance during rehabilitation (hamstrings pull the tibia posteriorly, stressing the healing PCL); outcomes of non-operative management for isolated Grade I–II PCL tears are generally satisfactory
Grade III isolated Complete PCL tear; posterior translation >10 mm; tibia posterior to femoral condyles; isolated (no combined ligamentous injury) Controversial — non-operative vs surgical; most authors recommend a trial of non-operative management for isolated Grade III tears in low-demand patients; high-demand athletes, patients with Grade III tears that fail non-operative management, or those with associated ligamentous injuries are candidates for PCL reconstruction; key evidence — medium-term studies show that isolated Grade III PCL injuries treated non-operatively have acceptable functional outcomes in many patients, but chronic posterior instability predisposes to medial and patellofemoral compartment cartilage degeneration over time
Combined PCL + other ligament injury PCL tear with PLC, MCL, ACL, or multi-ligament injury (knee dislocation); Grade III with associated instability Surgical reconstruction — indicated; in combined injuries, non-operative management produces unacceptable residual instability; acute reconstruction (within 2–3 weeks) preferred before scar tissue makes reconstruction more difficult; combined PCL + PLC injury is particularly unstable and must be surgically addressed
Bony PCL avulsion (tibial) PCL avulsion fracture at the tibial insertion; bony fragment visible on lateral X-ray; the bony fragment has attached PCL ORIF (open reduction and internal fixation) — screw fixation of the bony fragment back to its insertion; better outcomes than reconstruction because the native PCL substance is intact; avulsion repair results are superior to PCL reconstruction
Surgical Reconstruction
  • Graft choices: bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) — historically preferred for PCL reconstruction due to reliable bone-to-bone healing at the femoral and tibial tunnels; hamstring tendon (4-strand semitendinosus/gracilis) — popular alternative; allograft (Achilles tendon, BPTB allograft) — commonly used for PCL reconstruction particularly in combined multi-ligament injuries where multiple graft sources are needed; the PCL tibial tunnel is the most technically demanding part of the reconstruction due to the proximity of the posterior neurovascular structures — the popliteal artery and tibial nerve lie immediately posterior to the tibial PCL footprint; the `killer turn` — the acute angle the graft must make at the posterior tibial tunnel exit is a recognised cause of graft stress and failure in PCL reconstruction
  • Tibial inlay technique: an alternative to the transtibial tunnel technique; a bone block graft is placed directly into a trough at the posterior tibial PCL footprint (avoiding the need for a posterior tibial tunnel) — eliminates the `killer turn`; requires prone positioning with a posterior approach to the knee; less commonly used due to technical complexity but biomechanically addresses the graft angulation problem
  • The `kill zone` / posterior capsule risk: when reaming the tibial PCL tunnel, the drill exits through the posterior cortex of the tibia; the popliteal artery is at risk; a PCL drill guide is used to protect the posterior structures; intraoperative fluoroscopy confirms guide pin position; the transseptal portal approach to the tibial tunnel (through the posterior capsule via an arthroscopic transseptal window) was developed to improve visualisation and reduce neurovascular risk
  • Post-operative rehabilitation: weight-bearing as tolerated in a brace locked in extension (prevents posterior sag); hamstring activation delayed for 6–8 weeks; quadriceps strengthening commenced early; return to sport typically 9–12 months (slower than ACL reconstruction due to the challenges of PCL graft healing)
Exam Pearls
  • PCL anatomy: lateral aspect of medial femoral condyle → posterior tibial plateau 1 cm below articular surface; ALB (larger, flexion-tight) + PMB (smaller, extension-tight); extrasynovial → better blood supply → superior healing potential vs ACL
  • Mechanism: dashboard injury most common (posterior force on flexed knee); fall on flexed knee with plantarflexed foot; hyperextension; 85% combined injuries — ACL (48%), PLC, PMC most common partners
  • Grading: I (1–5 mm) — partial, non-op; II (6–10 mm) — complete isolated, non-op; III (>10 mm) — complete + associated ligament injury, likely surgical; tibia posterior to femoral condyles on lateral = Grade III
  • Posterior drawer test: most sensitive/specific clinical test (~90% sensitivity); 90° flexion, push tibia posteriorly; assess posterior sag sign FIRST to avoid false-positive anterior drawer
  • Posterior sag sign (Godfrey): tibia drops posteriorly at 90° hip/knee flexion under gravity; Quadriceps active test: quad contraction at 90° reduces posteriorly sagged tibia anteriorly = diagnostic of PCL deficiency
  • MRI PCL tear: AP diameter >7 mm on sagittal T2 = ruptured PCL; 62% of acute tears maintain continuity (thickened, not gapped); chronic tears scar in continuity — easily missed on standard MRI; stress radiographs confirm; bony avulsion = cortical flake at posterior tibia
  • Knee dislocation: 25% nerve injury (common peroneal — foot drop); 18% vascular injury (popliteal artery); ABI <0.9 → CT angiography; serial vascular assessment 24–48 hours
  • Non-operative success for Grade I–II: brace in extension; quad strengthening; avoid hamstrings; PCL heals better than ACL due to blood supply; satisfactory outcomes in most isolated low-grade tears
  • Bony tibial avulsion: ORIF with screw fixation; superior to reconstruction (native PCL intact); acute surgery preferred
  • Surgical pearls: `killer turn` at posterior tibial tunnel = graft stress/failure risk; tibial inlay eliminates this; protect popliteal artery during tibial tunnel drilling; combined PCL + PLC = unstable, always surgical
🧠 Test Yourself with OrthoMind AI

10 AI-generated high-yield questions by our AI engine

References

Fanelli GC, Edson CJ. Posterior cruciate ligament injuries in trauma patients. Arthroscopy. 1995;11(5):526–529.
Kannus P et al. Injuries to the posterior cruciate ligament of the knee. Sports Med. 1991;12(2):110–131.
Margheritini F et al. Posterior cruciate ligament injuries in the athlete: an anatomical, biomechanical and clinical review. Sports Med. 2002;32(6):393–408.
Strobel MJ, Weiler A, Schulz MS. Isolated PCL injuries — treatment and results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007.
MacGillivray JD, Stein BE. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop Clin North Am. 2003.
Rubinstein RA Jr et al. The accuracy of the clinical examination in the setting of posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1994.
LaPrade RF et al. Posterior cruciate ligament: The long-term functional outcome of patients treated non-operatively. Am J Sports Med. 2013.
Bolog NV, Andreisek G. Imaging the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments. J Belg Soc Radiol. 2016;100(1):98. PMC6100662. CC BY 4.0.
Campbells Operative Orthopaedics. 14th Edition. Elsevier.
Orthobullets — PCL Injuries; Knee Dislocation; Posterolateral Corner.