Garden I–II = non-displaced, III–IV = displaced. Pauwels I <30°, II 30–50°, III >50° vertical shear. Young = urgent reduction + fixation (CS/DHS). Elderly = arthroplasty if displaced. Complications: AVN, nonunion.
10 AI-generated high-yield questions by our AI engine
Femoral neck fractures are among the most clinically significant injuries in orthopaedics, disproportionately affecting the elderly osteoporotic population and carrying a one-year mortality of 20–35%. They represent a unique fracture where the choice of surgical treatment — internal fixation to preserve the femoral head vs arthroplasty to replace it — is critically dependent on the patient`s age, physiological status, degree of displacement, and pre-existing hip disease. The two most widely used classification systems — Garden (displacement) and Pauwels (fracture angle) — directly guide this decision-making.
| Garden Grade | Description | AP X-ray Finding | AVN Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade I — Incomplete / valgus impacted | Incomplete fracture; the inferior cortex is intact; the femoral head is tilted into valgus; the trabecular pattern is malaligned but the fracture is stable; the head is impacted superiorly | Valgus tilt of femoral head; trabeculae of femoral head appear more vertical than normal; incomplete fracture line visible inferiorly | Low (~10%); retinacular vessels are unlikely to be fully disrupted in an impacted valgus fracture |
| Grade II — Complete, undisplaced | Complete fracture through the femoral neck but WITHOUT displacement; the trabecular pattern remains aligned (trabeculae of femoral head are continuous with those of the acetabulum); no varus or valgus tilt | Complete fracture line; normal trabecular alignment; no displacement | Low–moderate (~10–15%); vessels intact but at risk from haematoma pressure |
| Grade III — Complete, partially displaced | Complete fracture with partial displacement; the femoral head is rotated into varus; the trabecular pattern is MALALIGNED — the trabeculae of the femoral head are no longer continuous with those of the acetabulum; posterior capsule remains partially intact | Varus tilt of femoral head; trabecular malalignment; partial displacement; head rotates into apparent abduction | High (~20–30%); retinacular vessels likely kinked or partially torn |
| Grade IV — Complete, fully displaced | Complete fracture with full displacement; the femoral head lies free in the acetabulum (no soft tissue attachment restraining it); the trabecular pattern paradoxically REALIGNS (the femoral head reorients to the acetabulum due to the capsular detachment) — this `realignment` on the AP view in a displaced fracture = Grade IV | Full displacement; the femoral head trabeculae paradoxically re-align with the acetabulum (head is free and reorients); the femoral shaft is proximally migrated and externally rotated | Very high (~30%); retinacular vessels fully torn; head is devascularised |
| Pauwels Type | Fracture Angle (from horizontal) | Biomechanical Forces | Stability & Clinical Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type I | <30° from horizontal | Compressive forces predominate across the fracture; the fracture line is nearly horizontal; compressive load drives the fragments together; inherently stable | Most stable; good healing potential; low non-union rate; compression load promotes union; internal fixation straightforward |
| Type II | 30–50° from horizontal | Mixed compressive and shear forces; moderate obliquity; intermediate stability | Moderate stability; reasonable healing potential with adequate fixation; intermediate non-union risk |
| Type III | >50° from horizontal (approaching vertical) | Shear forces predominate; the fracture line is steep/vertical; axial load produces shear across the fracture rather than compression; the fragments tend to slide past each other rather than being compressed together; mechanically very unstable | Most unstable; highest non-union rate; internal fixation is most at risk of failure; shear forces cause hardware to cut out; Pauwels III in a young patient is a technically demanding fixation problem; valgus intertrochanteric osteotomy may be used to convert the shear forces to compression in selected cases |
| Patient Group | Fracture | Treatment of Choice | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elderly (>65), low-demand, undisplaced (Garden I/II) | Garden I / II | Cannulated cancellous screws (3 screws in inverted triangle configuration); or dynamic hip screw (DHS) with derotation screw | Low AVN risk; fixation preserves the native femoral head; shorter operation; less morbidity than arthroplasty in low-demand elderly patient |
| Elderly (>65), low-demand, displaced (Garden III/IV) | Garden III / IV | Hemiarthroplasty (HA) — cemented Austin-Moore or Thompson (older, unipolar), or cemented bipolar HA (Charnley-Hastings) | High AVN/non-union rate with fixation in displaced fractures; hemiarthroplasty eliminates the risk of AVN and non-union; cement fixation faster rehabilitation and lower peri-prosthetic fracture risk; bipolar HA reduces acetabular erosion vs unipolar |
| Active, independent elderly (>65), displaced (Garden III/IV) | Garden III / IV | Total hip arthroplasty (THA) — NICE guideline recommends THA over HA for patients who were able to walk independently and have no cognitive impairment; cemented femoral stem preferred in elderly (lower peri-prosthetic fracture risk); standard bearing surfaces | HEALTH and HIP ATTACK trials demonstrate superior functional outcomes (Harris Hip Score, Oxford Hip Score) and lower re-operation rates with THA vs HA in fit elderly patients; NICE NG124 (2020) recommends THA for patients meeting activity and cognition criteria; dislocation risk of THA is the main disadvantage |
| Young patient (<60), any displacement | Garden I–IV | Urgent anatomical reduction + internal fixation; displaced fractures require URGENT reduction (within 6–12 hours) to restore blood supply and reduce AVN risk; cannulated screws or sliding hip screw + derotation screw; Pauwels III may require valgus osteotomy or blade plate; the femoral head MUST be preserved in young patients | The young patient has decades of life ahead — arthroplasty is NOT an appropriate primary treatment; THA has a finite implant life and revision arthroplasty at age 40–50 carries high morbidity; every effort must be made to preserve the native femoral head even if AVN risk is high; AVN can be managed with core decompression, vascularised fibula graft, or eventual THA later |
10 AI-generated high-yield questions by our AI engine