Orthonotes Logo
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories

Shoulder Arthroplasty — Indications

4 Views

Category: Arthroplasty

Share Wiki QR Card Download Slides (.pptx)
Hemiarthroplasty: isolated humeral head disease (e.g., AVN, head-splitting fracture). Anatomic TSA: primary OA, RA, post-traumatic arthritis with intact rotator cuff. Reverse TSA: cuff tear arthropathy, pseudoparalysis, failed TSA. Contraindications: active infection, absent deltoid (RSA). Choice depends on cuff integrity, bone stock, patient age/activity.
Published Feb 28, 2026 • Author: The Bone Stories ✅
🧠 Test Yourself with OrthoMind AI

10 AI-generated high-yield questions by our AI engine



Overview & Anatomy

Shoulder arthroplasty encompasses a spectrum of procedures from hemiarthroplasty (humeral head replacement only) to total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA, both humeral and glenoid replacement) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Correct patient selection — matching the right procedure to the right diagnosis — is the most critical determinant of outcome. An intact or repairable rotator cuff is a prerequisite for anatomical shoulder arthroplasty.

  • The glenohumeral joint is the most mobile joint in the body — a shallow glenoid socket on a mobile scapula; stability provided predominantly by the rotator cuff, capsulo-labral complex, and negative intra-articular pressure rather than bony congruity
  • Normal glenohumeral anatomy: glenoid retroverts approximately 7° relative to the scapular plane; humeral head retroversion approximately 20–30°; neck-shaft angle approximately 130–135°; these parameters guide component positioning in anatomical TSA
  • Rotator cuff assessment is the pivotal examination step: an intact or reconstructable rotator cuff (particularly supraspinatus and subscapularis) is required for anatomical shoulder arthroplasty to function; irreparable rotator cuff tear mandates reverse shoulder arthroplasty
  • Subscapularis: most critical muscle for anterior stability and internal rotation; divided as part of the deltopectoral approach; must be repaired meticulously; failure leads to anterior instability and progressive glenoid loosening
Types of Shoulder Arthroplasty
Procedure Components Replaced Rotator Cuff Requirement Primary Indication
Hemiarthroplasty (HA) Humeral head only Intact cuff required 4-part proximal humerus fracture; AVN humeral head; young patients preserving glenoid
Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) Humeral head + glenoid component Intact cuff — mandatory Glenohumeral OA with intact cuff; primary arthritis; post-traumatic OA with intact cuff
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) Reversed ball-and-socket — glenosphere on glenoid; cup on humerus Rotator cuff IRREPARABLE — relies on deltoid Cuff tear arthropathy; irreparable rotator cuff tear; failed anatomical TSA; complex fracture in elderly
Resurfacing arthroplasty Humeral head cap — bone-conserving Intact cuff Young active patients with OA; preserves bone stock; no intramedullary canal instrumentation
  • Total shoulder arthroplasty: gold standard for glenohumeral OA with intact rotator cuff; superior pain relief and function compared to hemiarthroplasty for primary OA; the glenoid component is the weak link — glenoid loosening is the most common cause of revision
  • Hemiarthroplasty vs TSA in OA: multiple RCTs and meta-analyses show TSA provides superior pain relief, range of motion, and patient satisfaction compared to HA for primary OA — TSA preferred when glenoid is arthritic and cuff is intact
Indications by Diagnosis
Diagnosis Preferred Procedure Notes
Primary glenohumeral OA + intact cuff TSA Gold standard; superior to HA in OA; address glenoid retroversion (>15° — augmented glenoid or eccentric reaming)
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) TSA or RSA depending on cuff status Rotator cuff commonly involved in RA; assess carefully; bone quality poor; cement fixation often needed
Cuff tear arthropathy Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) Irreparable cuff + arthritis; RSA replaces cuff function with deltoid leverage; do NOT perform anatomical TSA
4-part proximal humerus fracture (acute) RSA (increasingly) or HA RSA preferred in elderly (>75) — more predictable function than HA; HA needs tuberosity healing which often fails
AVN humeral head (early stages) HA or resurfacing Preserve glenoid if not arthritic; TSA if glenoid involved; core decompression for Stages I–II
Failed previous shoulder arthroplasty RSA (most revisions) Glenoid loosening most common failure; subscapularis insufficiency; RSA handles cuff deficiency and instability
Glenohumeral Arthritis — Classification (Walch)

The Walch classification (1999) describes glenoid morphology in primary glenohumeral OA and guides component selection and surgical technique.

Walch Type Glenoid Morphology Surgical Implication
A1 Central wear; concentric glenoid; minimal retroversion Standard glenoid component; straightforward
A2 Central wear with medialisation; deep central erosion Risk of perforation; careful reaming; augment if necessary
B1 Posterior wear; subchondral sclerosis posteriorly; no subluxation Eccentric anterior reaming to correct retroversion
B2 Posterior wear + biconcave glenoid; posterior subluxation of humeral head Most complex anatomical TSA glenoid; eccentric reaming vs augmented/asymmetric glenoid component
B3 Monoconcave glenoid with >15° retroversion; posterior subluxation >80% Consider RSA or augmented glenoid; very difficult to correct with standard component
C Dysplastic retroversion (>25°) regardless of wear; developmental origin Augmented glenoid or consider RSA; challenging anatomy
  • Walch B2: most common complex glenoid variant in primary OA; posterior glenoid erosion creates biconcave glenoid; requires either eccentric anterior reaming (risks anterior perforation) or augmented posterior glenoid component to correct retroversion and restore neutral version
  • Glenoid retroversion correction: for every 1 mm of eccentric reaming, approximately 3° of retroversion is corrected; maximum safe eccentric reaming approximately 10–12 mm before risk of anterior perforation
Surgical Approach
  • Deltopectoral approach: standard for all anatomical shoulder arthroplasty and most RSA; internervous plane between deltoid (axillary nerve) and pectoralis major (medial/lateral pectoral nerves); cephalic vein retracted medially or laterally
  • Subscapularis management: three options — tenotomy (cut and repair), peel (osteotomy of lesser tuberosity), or subscapularis-sparing (SST) — subscapularis-sparing approach avoids the risk of subscapularis failure but limits glenoid exposure
  • Subscapularis failure after TSA: catastrophic complication — leads to anterior instability, progressive posterior glenoid wear (rockwood sign — superior migration + glenoid destruction), and rapid implant failure; subscapularis repair integrity must be confirmed at 6 weeks post-operatively; protect repair in rehabilitation
  • Superior approach: used for some RSA configurations (superolateral deltoid split) — avoids subscapularis but limited glenoid exposure; suits RSA where glenoid access via deltopectoral approach is adequate
Glenoid Component — Design & Fixation
  • All-polyethylene cemented glenoid: traditional design; excellent long-term data; keel or pegged fixation; cement provides immediate fixation; 10-year survivorship approximately 90%
  • Metal-backed glenoid: allows cementless fixation; modular PE exchange; early results disappointing due to backside wear and early loosening — largely abandoned for anatomical TSA but used in RSA baseplate
  • Glenoid loosening (rocking horse phenomenon): the most common cause of revision in anatomical TSA; eccentric loading from malpositioning or edge loading causes cyclic micromotion at cement-bone interface → peripheral scalloping (rocking horse radiograph sign) → progressive loosening; meticulous glenoid preparation and component positioning are essential to prevent this
  • Pegged vs keeled glenoid: multiple RCTs show no significant difference in survivorship; pegged glenoid associated with lower radiolucent line rates in some series; surgeon preference
Consultant-Level Considerations
  • Pre-operative CT planning with 3D reconstruction: mandatory for complex glenoid deformity (Walch B2, B3, C); allows measurement of retroversion, bone stock, and planning of reaming depth and component size; 3D printing of patient-specific guides now available for augmented glenoid placement
  • Humeral head version: target 20–30° of retroversion at implantation; over-retroverted humeral component increases posterior instability; under-retroverted increases anterior instability and subscapularis tension; intraoperative assessment using forearm as reference (20–30° ER with elbow at 90° = correct version)
  • Periprosthetic joint infection in shoulder arthroplasty: Cutibacterium acnes (formerly Propionibacterium acnes) most common pathogen in shoulder — slow-growing anaerobe; cultures must be held for 14 days; serology (CRP, ESR) often normal; high index of suspicion for unexplained pain, stiffness, or loosening after shoulder arthroplasty; two-stage revision protocol
  • Axillary nerve protection: lies 5–7 mm distal to the inferior glenoid rim; at risk during inferior capsular release and anterior glenoid preparation; always identify and protect before inferior capsule release
  • Young patients and shoulder arthroplasty: avoid glenoid component in patients under 50 with intact glenoid cartilage if possible — hemiarthroplasty or resurfacing preserves glenoid for future TSA; glenoid bone loss from repeated revision makes late TSA difficult
Exam Pearls
  • TSA = gold standard for glenohumeral OA with intact rotator cuff; superior to HA in all outcome measures for primary OA
  • Rotator cuff integrity is the pivotal decision — intact cuff = anatomical TSA; irreparable cuff = RSA
  • Walch B2: biconcave glenoid + posterior subluxation = most complex OA glenoid variant; eccentric reaming vs augmented component
  • Glenoid loosening = most common TSA revision cause; rocking horse sign on X-ray; cemented all-poly glenoid is standard
  • Subscapularis failure = catastrophic; anterior instability + rapid glenoid destruction; protect repair to 6 weeks minimum
  • Cuff tear arthropathy: RSA; do NOT perform anatomical TSA without functioning cuff
  • 4-part fracture in elderly (>75): RSA preferred over HA — more predictable function; tuberosity healing unreliable with HA
  • Cutibacterium acnes: most common shoulder PJI organism; anaerobe; cultures held 14 days; serology often normal
  • Axillary nerve: 5–7 mm below inferior glenoid rim; protect during inferior capsule release
  • Pre-op CT planning: mandatory for Walch B2/B3/C glenoids; 3D reconstruction guides reaming and augment selection
🧠 Test Yourself with OrthoMind AI

10 AI-generated high-yield questions by our AI engine

References

Walch G et al. Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14(6):756–760.
Neer CS 2nd. Replacement arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56(1):1–13.
Norris TR, Iannotti JP. Functional outcome after shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: a multicenter study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11(2):130–135.
Edwards TB et al. Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003.
Farng E, Zingmond D, Krenek L, Soohoo NF. Factors predicting complication rates after primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011.
Padegimas EM et al. Periprosthetic shoulder infection: the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of reoperation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015.
Boileau P et al. Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005.
Campbells Operative Orthopaedics. 14th Edition. Elsevier.
Rockwood and Matsen. The Shoulder. 5th Edition. Elsevier.
Orthobullets — Shoulder Arthroplasty, Glenohumeral Arthritis.