10 AI-generated high-yield questions by our AI engine
Overview & Indications
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful operations in all of surgery and the most commonly performed elective orthopaedic procedure worldwide. It reliably relieves pain and restores function in end-stage hip disease. Understanding approaches, implant selection, bearing surfaces, and complications is fundamental knowledge for all orthopaedic surgeons.
Approximately 2.5 million THAs performed globally each year; numbers increasing as population ages and younger patients are offered surgery
Contraindications: active infection (absolute), neurological impairment precluding rehabilitation, severe medical comorbidity, non-ambulatory patient with no pain (relative)
Timing: failure of conservative management (analgesia, activity modification, physiotherapy, walking aids, weight loss) combined with significant impact on quality of life and radiological evidence of joint destruction
Oxford Hip Score (OHS): validated patient-reported outcome measure for THA; 12 questions; 0–48 scale (48 = best function); used pre- and post-operatively to assess outcomes and justify surgical intervention
Surgical Approaches
Approach
Internervous Plane
Structures at Risk
Dislocation Direction
Posterior (Southern/Moore)
Gluteus maximus split; short external rotators divided
Sciatic nerve; superior gluteal nerve if too superior
Posterior dislocation — avoid flexion + IR + adduction
Anterolateral (Hardinge/Watson-Jones)
Between gluteus medius/minimus and tensor fascia lata (TFL); superior gluteal nerve
Superior gluteal nerve (if dissection extends >5 cm above GT); femoral nerve (anterior)
Anterior dislocation — avoid extension + ER
Direct Anterior (DAA / Smith-Petersen)
Between sartorius (femoral N) and TFL (superior gluteal N) — truly internervous
Splits gluteus medius and vastus lateralis through greater trochanter
Superior gluteal nerve; abductor mechanism detachment
Anterior or posterior depending on component position
Posterior approach: most widely used worldwide; highest dislocation risk (3–4% without posterior capsule repair; reduced to ~1% with meticulous posterior capsule and short rotator repair); sciatic nerve injury most feared complication
Direct anterior approach (DAA): growing in popularity; truly internervous; allows intraoperative fluoroscopy for component positioning; faster rehabilitation in some series; higher learning curve; LFCN injury rate 5–15%; fracture risk in femoral preparation
Hardinge (direct lateral): associated with abductor lurch (Trendelenburg) from gluteus medius damage if trochanteric reattachment fails — up to 15–20% incidence of persistent Trendelenburg in some series
Safe zone for superior gluteal nerve: stay within 5 cm proximal to the tip of the greater trochanter in anterolateral and direct lateral approaches
Implant Fixation
Fixation Type
Mechanism
Indication
Cemented (PMMA)
Bone cement fills interface; immediate mechanical fixation; relies on cement mantle integrity
Initial press-fit stability; biological osseointegration into porous/HA-coated surface
Younger patients (<65), good bone stock; requires 6–8 weeks for osseointegration
Hybrid
Cemented stem + cementless cup (most common); or reverse hybrid (cementless stem + cemented cup)
Middle-aged patients; balances advantages of both; most common configuration in UK
Cement implantation syndrome (BCIS — bone cement implantation syndrome): hypotension, hypoxia, cardiac arrhythmia, and cardiac arrest at time of cement pressurisation or stem insertion; caused by fat, marrow, and cement monomer embolisation; risk highest in elderly with cardiorespiratory disease; venting the femoral canal reduces risk; anaesthetic team must be alerted before cement insertion
NJR (National Joint Registry, UK): reports 10-year survivorship for primary THA at approximately 95%; cemented and cementless fixation have equivalent long-term outcomes in appropriate patient selection
Cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE): radiation cross-linking dramatically reduces polyethylene wear rate (approximately 80% reduction vs conventional PE); now standard bearing in most centres; highly oxidised XLPE (Vitamin E-stabilised) further improves oxidation resistance
Metal-on-metal: all large-head MoM THAs and resurfacings require annual surveillance — serum cobalt and chromium ion levels; MARS MRI for pseudotumour; MHRA guidance mandates follow-up protocol
Complications
Complication
Incidence
Key Points
Dislocation
1–3% primary; 5–10% revision
Most common early complication; posterior approach highest risk; direction depends on approach; closed reduction under sedation first-line; revision for recurrent instability
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI)
1–2%
Most devastating complication; Staphylococcus most common organism; diagnosis by MSIS criteria; treat with DAIR (early), single-stage, or two-stage revision; suppressive antibiotics for non-operative cases
Aseptic loosening
Leading cause of revision at 10–20 years
Wear particle-induced osteolysis; pain on weight-bearing; lucent lines on X-ray; revision required when symptomatic
Periprosthetic fracture (PPF)
0.1–1% primary; higher cementless
Vancouver classification (A, B, C); B2/B3 require revision; B1 treated with ORIF around well-fixed stem
Nerve injury
Sciatic 0.5–2%; femoral <0.5%
Sciatic most common (posterior approach); peroneal division most vulnerable; limb lengthening >2.5 cm increases risk; observe for recovery; neurophysiology at 3 months
VTE (DVT/PE)
DVT 1–2% symptomatic; PE 0.1–0.2%
Chemical and mechanical prophylaxis mandatory; NICE guidelines: LMWH or rivaroxaban for 28 days post-THA
Leg length discrepancy (LLD)
10–15% perceive LLD >5 mm
>2.5 cm LLD: sciatic nerve at risk; inform patients pre-operatively; templating essential
Consultant-Level Considerations
Vancouver classification for periprosthetic femoral fractures: Type A (trochanteric); Type B1 (around/below stem — stem well fixed); Type B2 (stem loose); Type B3 (stem loose + poor bone stock); Type C (below stem); B2/B3 = revision surgery; B1 = ORIF with plates ± cables
Instability after THA: the most common cause of revision in modern practice in the UK (NJR data); assess component positioning (cup anteversion 15–20°, abduction 40–45° — combined anteversion concept); trochanteric advancement for abductor deficiency; constrained liner for recurrent instability when component position is satisfactory
Corrosion at modular junction (trunnion corrosion): cobalt-chrome taper corrosion in modular THA generates local metal debris even without MoM bearing surface; adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) mimicking infection; elevated serum cobalt; MARS MRI for assessment; may require modular head exchange
THA in dysplasia: complex anatomy — high hip centre, deficient acetabular bone stock, femoral deformity, short femur; may require acetabular augmentation (structural allograft, cage, augment), true acetabular cup placement even at high position, and modular or custom femoral stems; high-volume surgeon and centre
Obesity and THA: BMI >40 associated with higher complication rates (infection, dislocation, VTE, wound problems); frank discussion with patient; optimise BMI pre-operatively; some centres set BMI threshold (<40) before listing
Exam Pearls
Posterior approach: highest dislocation risk; sciatic nerve at risk; posterior capsule + short rotator repair reduces dislocation to ~1%
Hardinge (direct lateral): Trendelenburg from abductor damage; superior gluteal nerve at risk if >5 cm above GT
10 AI-generated high-yield questions by our AI engine
References
National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. 20th Annual Report. 2023. njrcentre.org.uk.
Hardinge K. The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1982;64(1):17–19.
Moore AT. The self-locking metal hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1957;39(4):811–827.
Charnley J. Arthroplasty of the hip: a new operation. Lancet. 1961;1(7187):1129–1132.
Parvizi J et al. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(11):2992–2994.
Duncan CP, Masri BA. Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:293–304.
Lombardi AV et al. Aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004.
Lewis GN et al. Outcomes of total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prosthesis and patient factors. Bone Joint J. 2018.
NICE Guideline NG89: Venous thromboembolism in over 16s. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 2019.
Campbells Operative Orthopaedics. 14th Edition. Elsevier.
Orthobullets — Total Hip Arthroplasty, Approaches and Complications.